Pipe v. Shepherd, etal Pet of Corning Hosp, etal
This text of Pipe v. Shepherd, etal Pet of Corning Hosp, etal (Pipe v. Shepherd, etal Pet of Corning Hosp, etal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
ELIZABETH PIPE, INDIVIDUALLY AND : No. 387 MAL 2014 AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE : ESTATE OF JASON PIPE : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : WILLIAM C. SHEPHERD, M.D.; CARSON : THOMPSON, M.D.; ROBERT PACKER : HOSPITAL; CORNING HOSPITAL : T/D/B/A GUTHRIE CORNING : DEVELOPMENT HOSPITAL, INC.; : GUTHRIE CLINIC LTD T/D/B/A : GUTHRIE CLINIC, A PROFESSIONAL : CORPORATION T/D/B/A GUTHRIE : CLINICS GROUP PRACTICE : PARTNERSHIP, L.L.P. : : : PETITION OF: CORNING HOSPITAL, : ROBERT PACKER HOSPITAL AND : CARSON THOMPSON, M.D. :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pipe v. Shepherd, etal Pet of Corning Hosp, etal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pipe-v-shepherd-etal-pet-of-corning-hosp-etal-pa-2014.