Home/New York Court of Appeals/Piotrowski v. Patel

Piotrowski v. Patel

771 N.E.2d 832, 98 N.Y.2d 644, 744 N.Y.S.2d 760, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1038
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 2, 2002
DocketAppeal 1
StatusPublished

This text of 771 N.E.2d 832 (Piotrowski v. Patel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piotrowski v. Patel, 771 N.E.2d 832, 98 N.Y.2d 644, 744 N.Y.S.2d 760, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1038 (N.Y. 2002).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appel *645 late Division order affirming the judgment, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
771 N.E.2d 832, 98 N.Y.2d 644, 744 N.Y.S.2d 760, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piotrowski-v-patel-ny-2002.