Piorkowski v. Hospital for Special Surgery

116 A.D.3d 560, 983 N.Y.S.2d 720
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 2014·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered July 25, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ cross motion for a pretrial hearing, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

An evidentiary ruling made before trial is generally reviewable only in connection with the appeal from the judgment rendered after trial (see Santos v Nicolas, 65 AD3d 941 [1st Dept 2009]; Rivera v New York Health & Hosps. Corp. [Bellevue [561]*561Hosp. Ctr. & Gouverneur Diagnostic & Treatment Ctr.], 38 AD3d 476 [1st Dept 2007]). Accordingly, no appeal lies from the order which denied defendants’ motion seeking a Frye hearing (see Frye v United States, 293 F 1013 [DC Cir 1923]) concerning plaintiffs’ proposed expert testimony (see Rodriguez v Ford Motor Co., 17 AD3d 159, 160 [1st Dept 2005]). Concur — Friedman, J.E, Sweeny, Andrias, Gische and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piorkowski v. Hospital for Special Surgery, 116 A.D.3d 560, 983 N.Y.S.2d 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

116 A.D.3d 560 (Piorkowski v. Hospital for Special Surgery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knafo v. Mount Sinai Hosp.
2020 NY Slip Op 3462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Ray v. Ray
121 A.D.3d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)