Pioneer Village Development Corp. v. XAR Corp.
This text of 397 N.E.2d 1334 (Pioneer Village Development Corp. v. XAR Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the ground that [753]*753the prior application for permission to appeal, made to the Appellate Division, was untimely (CPLR 5513, subd [c]; cf. CPLR 5514, subd [a]; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 101, p 429; see, e.g., Schwartz v National Computer Corp., 38 NY2d 800).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 N.E.2d 1334, 48 N.Y.2d 752, 422 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pioneer-village-development-corp-v-xar-corp-ny-1979.