Pioneer Village Development Corp. v. XAR Corp.

397 N.E.2d 1334, 48 N.Y.2d 752, 422 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2397
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 25, 1979
StatusPublished

This text of 397 N.E.2d 1334 (Pioneer Village Development Corp. v. XAR Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pioneer Village Development Corp. v. XAR Corp., 397 N.E.2d 1334, 48 N.Y.2d 752, 422 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2397 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the ground that [753]*753the prior application for permission to appeal, made to the Appellate Division, was untimely (CPLR 5513, subd [c]; cf. CPLR 5514, subd [a]; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 101, p 429; see, e.g., Schwartz v National Computer Corp., 38 NY2d 800).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartz v. National Computer Corp.
345 N.E.2d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 N.E.2d 1334, 48 N.Y.2d 752, 422 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pioneer-village-development-corp-v-xar-corp-ny-1979.