Pioneer Oil Co. v. State Department of Revenue

401 So. 2d 1319, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2776
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 23, 1981
DocketNo. 59147
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 401 So. 2d 1319 (Pioneer Oil Co. v. State Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pioneer Oil Co. v. State Department of Revenue, 401 So. 2d 1319, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2776 (Fla. 1981).

Opinion

McDONALD, Justice.

The Court accepted jurisdiction to review alleged conflict between Pioneer Oil Co., Inc. v. State Department of Revenue, 381 So.2d 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), and Anderson v. State Department of Revenue, 380 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), disapproved, 403 So.2d 397, (Fla.1981). Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. Although we consolidated these cases for oral argument, we choose to issue separate opinions. We approve the First District’s decision in Pioneer.

Section 206.87(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1978), imposes an eight-cent excise tax on each gallon of special fuel sold and makes dealers responsible for collecting the tax and remitting it to the state. Sales for home, industrial, commercial, agricultural, or marine purposes are specifically exempted from the tax levy. § 206.87(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1978). Pioneer, a licensed dealer of fuels, sold special fuel to several unlicensed dual users,1 but failed to comply with the Department of Revenue’s (DOR’s) rule 12B-5.03, Florida Administrative Code.2 Specifically, Pioneer accepted improperly filled out resale certificates from its purchasers.

At an administrative hearing, Pioneer showed that the fuel was used for exempt purposes. Nevertheless, an administrative order issued, requiring payment of taxes, penalties, and interest. The First District affirmed the order, holding that in the absence of a properly executed blanket exemption and/or resale certificate the initial dealer remained responsible for collecting and remitting the tax.

In its petition for review, Pioneer claims that subsections (3) and (4) of rule 12B-5.03 improperly negate the statutory exemption and that, in promulgating and enforcing this record-keeping rule, DOR has exceeded its power. We disagree.

[1321]*1321Exemptions contained in taxing statutes are special favors granted by the legislature and should be strictly construed against the taxpayers. State ex rel. Szabo Food Services, Inc. v. Dickinson, 286 So.2d 529 (Fla. 1973); United States Gypsum Co. v. Green, 110 So.2d 409 (Fla.1959). Section 206.59(1), Florida Statutes (1977), gives DOR the power to make rules and regulations, with the force and effect of law, to govern the reports and accounts of all dealers in order to ascertain liability for the special fuel tax. DOR is also authorized to prescribe all forms upon which reports are to be made. § 206.14(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). Acting under the authority of these sections, DOR promulgated rule 12B-5.03.

We find that rule 12B-5.03 does not exceed DOR’s statutory power. Additionally, we agree with the district court that this rule does not impose a tax for failing to keep records. Chapter 206 imposes a tax on the sale of fuels and places on initial sellers the responsibility for collecting and remitting that tax. Rule 12B-5.03 sets out the method by which an initial seller can transfer this liability to a purchaser, whose use may or may not be exempt. By failing to follow the proper procedures, Pioneer retained its statutory responsibility.

We approve the decision of the First District Court of Appeal.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

TA Operating Corp. v. State, Department of Revenue
767 So. 2d 1270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Chestnut Fleet Rentals, Inc. v. State, Department of Revenue
559 So. 2d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 So. 2d 1319, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pioneer-oil-co-v-state-department-of-revenue-fla-1981.