Pioneer Mounting & Finishing Co. v. Shelley Graphics, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pioneer Mounting & Finishing Co. v. Shelley Graphics, Ltd.

19 A.D.2d 787, 243 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 787 (Pioneer Mounting & Finishing Co. v. Shelley Graphics, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pioneer Mounting & Finishing Co. v. Shelley Graphics, Ltd., 19 A.D.2d 787, 243 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on August 14, 1963, unanimously reversed on the law and the motion to vacate the warrant of attachment denied, without costs. We find that the papers on which the motion was granted are insufficient in that there was no dear averment of facts to support the contentions of the movant. In view of this disposition, it is not necessary to consider the motion addressed by respondent to the record, as the matter claimed to be incorporated improperly could and did have no bearing on the result. The motion is denied as academic. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Raibin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on August 14, 1963, unanimously reversed on the law and the motion to vacate the warrant of attachment denied, without costs. We find that the papers on which the motion was granted are insufficient in that there was no dear averment of facts to support the contentions of the movant. In view of this disposition, it is not necessary to consider the motion addressed by respondent to the record, as the matter claimed to be incorporated improperly could and did have no bearing on the result. The motion is denied as academic. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Raibin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 787, 243 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pioneer-mounting-finishing-co-v-shelley-graphics-ltd-nyappdiv-1963.