Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Risi

918 So. 2d 448, 2006 WL 167945
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 25, 2006
Docket4D05-2096
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 918 So. 2d 448 (Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Risi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Risi, 918 So. 2d 448, 2006 WL 167945 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

918 So.2d 448 (2006)

PIONEER ELECTRONICS (USA), INC., Petitioner,
v.
Mark RISI and Terry Hollis, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated, Respondents.

No. 4D05-2096.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 25, 2006.

Sharon L. Kegerreis and William T. Bisset of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, Miami, for petitioner.

Dorothy F. Easley of the Law Offices of Steven M. Ziegler, P.A., Hollywood, and *449 Jon M. Herskowitz of The Herskowitz Law Firm, Miami, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

In this consumer class action, petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to quash an order of the trial court requiring it to furnish unredacted Florida customer complaints regarding televisions it manufactured. Petitioner had redacted customer identifying information when producing the complaint reports. In Slim-Fast Foods Co. v. Brockmeyer, 627 So.2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), we held that such reports are not protected from discovery by Florida privacy protections. However, in Stewart v. Jones, 708 So.2d 996 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), we also held that such customer identifying information produced through discovery could not be used for purposes of solicitation of customers as named plaintiffs in a class action. See also Estate of Bobinger v. Deltona Corp., 563 So.2d 739 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990). Thus, we grant the petition to the extent that the order failed to include the limitation on use of customer information for solicitation. See Stewart. In all other respects, we deny the petition.

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Trades Institute of Florida, Inc. v. Sanchez
932 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Westlake Services, Inc. v. Ray
923 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
918 So. 2d 448, 2006 WL 167945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pioneer-electronics-usa-inc-v-risi-fladistctapp-2006.