Pioneer Cleaners & Dyers v. Miller

1 Cal. 2d 674
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 22, 1934
DocketL. A. No. 14772
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. 2d 674 (Pioneer Cleaners & Dyers v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pioneer Cleaners & Dyers v. Miller, 1 Cal. 2d 674 (Cal. 1934).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was filed too late.

The judgment was entered on October 9, 1933. The sixty-day period, provided by section 939" of the Code of Civil Procedure for filing notice of appeal, expired December 8, 1933, and no appeal was taken within that time. No proceedings on motion for a new trial were pending during said sixty-day period. The filing of a notice of intention to move for a new trial on December 20, 1933, was ineffectual to extend the time, and the situation here presented is not affected by section 12a of the Code of Civil Procedure. The motion must be granted on the authority of Lawson v. Guild, 215 Cal. 378 [10 Pac. (2d) 459].

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawson v. Guild
10 P.2d 459 (California Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. 2d 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pioneer-cleaners-dyers-v-miller-cal-1934.