Piombino v. City of Fresno

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 22, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-00298·Unknown

Opinion

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 10 CYNTHIA PIOMBINO, Case No. 1:24-cv-00298-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE v. 13 (ECF No. 34) CITY OF FRESNO, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES (“Stipulation and Joint Request for 17 Protective Order Regarding Confidential Documents”), and pursuant to the Court’s inherent and 18 statutory authority, including but not limited to the Court’s authority under the applicable Federal 19 Rules of Civil Procedure and the United States District Court, Eastern District of California 20 Local Rules; after due consideration of all the relevant pleadings, papers, and records in this 21 action; and upon such other evidence or argument as was presented to the Court; Good Cause 22 appearing therefore, and in furtherance of the interests of justice, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS 26 1.1 Action: This pending federal lawsuit in Cynthia Piombino v. City of 27 Fresno, et. al.; 1:24-cv-00298-KES-SAB. 1.2 Challenging Party: a party or non-party that challenges the designation of 1 information or items under this Order. 2 1.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information, in documentary or 3 electronic form, or tangible things that qualify for protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal 4 Rules of Civil Procedure, as specified above in the Good Cause Statement of the Stipulation and 5 Joint Request for Protective Order Regarding Confidential Documents, including the following 6 information or items: peace officer personnel records defined by California Penal Code sections 7 832.5, 832.7, 832.8, and the associated case law; medical and/or psychotherapeutic records; 8 autopsy photographs; and personal identifying information of third party witnesses or victims, 9 e.g. addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, and social security numbers. 10 1.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 11 support staff). 12 1.5 Designating Party: a party or non-party that designates information or 13 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 14 1.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 15 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other 16 things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures 17 or responses to discovery in this matter. 18 1.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 19 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a party or its counsel to serve as an expert 20 witness or as a consultant in this Action. 21 1.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action. 22 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 23 1.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 24 other legal entity not named as a Party to this Action. 25 1.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a Party to 26 this Action but are retained to represent or advise a Party to this Action and have appeared in this 27 Action on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of 1 1.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 2 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support 3 staffs). 4 1.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 5 Discovery Material in this Action. 6 1.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 7 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 8 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 9 subcontractors. 10 1.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 11 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 12 1.15 Receiving Party: a party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 13 from a Producing Party. 14 1.16 Final Disposition: is defined as the conclusion of any appellate 15 proceedings in this Action, or, if no appeal is taken, when the time for filing of an appeal has run. 16 2. SCOPE OF PROTECTION 17 The protections conferred by this Protective Order cover not only Protected Material (as 18 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 19 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 20 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 21 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the Court. 22 This Protective Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 24 Disclosure and discovery in this case are likely to involve production of 25 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 26 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than this litigation may be warranted. 27 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to the following Protective Order. 1 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from 2 public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to 3 confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as 4 set forth below, that this Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 5 under seal except to the extent specified herein; U.S. District Court, Eastern District Local Rules 6 141, 141.1, 143, and 251 set(s) forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the 7 standards that will be applied when a Party seeks permission from the court to file material under 8 seal. 9 Nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed so as to require or mandate 10 that any Party disclose or produce privileged information or records that could be designated as 11 Confidential Documents/Protected Material hereunder. 12 3. DURATION OF PROTECTED MATERIAL/CONFIDENTIAL 14 Except as set forth below, the terms of this Protective Order apply through Final 15 Disposition of the Action. The Parties may stipulate that the they will be contractually bound by 16 the terms of Stipulation and Joint Request for Protective Order Regarding Confidential 17 Documents beyond Final Disposition, but will have to file a separate action for enforcement of 18 the agreement once all proceedings in this Action are complete. 19 Once a case proceeds to trial, any use of Protected Material shall be governed by 20 the orders of the Court. 21 4. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 22 4.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 23 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this 24 Protective Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies 25 under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those 26 parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so that other 27 portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not 1 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 2 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 3 unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and 4 burdens on other parties) may expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 5 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated 6 for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other 7 Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 8 4.2 Manner and Timing of Designations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piombino v. City of Fresno, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Piombino v. City of Fresno (Piombino v. City of Fresno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)