Pinto v. Town of Greenburgh

170 A.D.2d 685, 567 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3148
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Town of Greenburgh, dated December 19, 1988, which denied the petitioner’s application, in effect, for reconsideration of a prior determination of the Town of Greenburgh, dated November 26, 1986, made after an evidentiary hearing, finding him guilty of certain misconduct and dismissing him from his position as a Recreation Supervisor with the Town of Green-burgh Department of Parks and Recreation, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered March 23, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding as time-barred.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner was dismissed from his position as a Recreation Supervisor of the Town of Greenburgh on November 26, 1986, following a hearing. His request in 1988 for reinstatement was nothing more than an application for reconsideration of the Town’s determination dismissing him from his position (see, Matter of De Milio v Borghard, 55 NY2d 216). Accordingly, the instant proceeding, commenced on January 31, 1989, was untimely and properly dismissed as time-barred (see, CPLR 217; Matter of De Milio v Borghard, supra). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pinto v. Town of Greenburgh, 170 A.D.2d 685, 567 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

170 A.D.2d 685 (Pinto v. Town of Greenburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mancuso v. Zaleski
207 A.D.2d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)