Pinto v. Major League Jewelers, Inc.

59 So. 3d 220, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3489, 2011 WL 904217
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 2011
DocketNos. 3D10-2481, 3D10-2527
StatusPublished

This text of 59 So. 3d 220 (Pinto v. Major League Jewelers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pinto v. Major League Jewelers, Inc., 59 So. 3d 220, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3489, 2011 WL 904217 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Case Number 3D10-2481, this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c), ordered that Renyel Pinto’s petition for writ of certiorari proceed as an appeal taken from a final order granting Major League Jewelers, Inc.’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. See GEICO Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Kramer, 575 So.2d 1345, 1346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (“A self-executing final judgment in an action wherein no further judicial labor is required or contemplated ends the litigation between the parties.”).

In Case Number 3D10-2527, Pinto filed a notice of appeal from the same final order and from the ensuing order denying his motion for rehearing.1 Having now determined the two appeals are duplicative, this Court, on its own motion, consolidates Case Numbers 3D10-2527 and 3D10-2481, and affirms the orders on appeal.

Cases consolidated; orders affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GEICO Financial Services, Inc. v. Kramer
575 So. 2d 1345 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 So. 3d 220, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3489, 2011 WL 904217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinto-v-major-league-jewelers-inc-fladistctapp-2011.