Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pintado v. State

Pintado v. State

831 So. 2d 816, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18116, 2002 WL 31757516
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 2002
DocketNo. 3D02-614
StatusPublished

This text of 831 So. 2d 816 (Pintado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pintado v. State, 831 So. 2d 816, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18116, 2002 WL 31757516 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant seeks review of the denial without hearing of a post conviction motion which sought additional credit for time served. Because of the uncertainty in the present record, particularly as to the reason for the defendant’s confinement in Orange County during the period for which the claim is now made, we vacate the order below and remand for an eviden-tiary hearing pursuant to Rule 3.850. Consult Tatum v. State, 811 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(SC02-952, stayed pending review in Gethers v. State, SC01-2639).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tatum v. State
811 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 So. 2d 816, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18116, 2002 WL 31757516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pintado-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.