Pintacuda v. Zuckeberg
593 S.E.2d 776, 358 N.C. 211, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 197
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 2, 2004
DocketNo. 509A03
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 593 S.E.2d 776 (Pintacuda v. Zuckeberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pintacuda v. Zuckeberg, 593 S.E.2d 776, 358 N.C. 211, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 197 (S.C. 2004).
Opinion
As to the issue on direct appeal, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. [212]*212Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to the additional issues was improvidently allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
RIEPER v. Pearce
690 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
593 S.E.2d 776, 358 N.C. 211, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pintacuda-v-zuckeberg-sc-2004.