Pinover v. Baltimore Pure Rye Distilling Co.

Ninth Circuit

Pinover v. Baltimore Pure Rye Distilling Co.

103 F.2d 1018, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3757

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 8, 1939

DocketNo. 9154

StatusPublished

This text of 103 F.2d 1018 (Pinover v. Baltimore Pure Rye Distilling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pinover v. Baltimore Pure Rye Distilling Co., 103 F.2d 1018, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3757 (9th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of motion of appellee for dismissal of the appeal herein for failure of appellant to make deposit covering estimated expense of printing the transcript, there being no opposition to said motion by appellant, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered said motion granted, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of motion of appellee for dismissal of the appeal herein for failure of appellant to make deposit covering estimated expense of printing the transcript, there being no opposition to said motion by appellant, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered said motion granted, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 F.2d 1018, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinover-v-baltimore-pure-rye-distilling-co-ca9-1939.