Pinney v. Bridenstine
This text of Pinney v. Bridenstine (Pinney v. Bridenstine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
PATRICIA L. PINNEY,
Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-2259 (JMC)
v.
JARED ISAACMAN, Administrator, National Aeronautics & Space Administration,
Defendant.
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED
that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, ECF 54, is DENIED, and Defendant’s motion for
summary judgment, ECF 55, is GRANTED.
The Clerk of Court shall terminate this case.
This is a final appealable Order.
SO ORDERED.
__________________________ JIA M. COBB United States District Judge
Date: March 5, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pinney v. Bridenstine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinney-v-bridenstine-dcd-2026.