Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
302 S.E.2d 253
Opinion
Edwin F. PINNER
v.
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a New York Corporation.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Cecil C. Jackson, Jr., Asheville, for plaintiff.
Roberts, Cogburn & Williams, Asheville, for defendants.
Plaintiff's petition for discretionary review, 60 N.C.App. 257, 298 S.E.2d 749, under G.S. § 7A-31. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 302 S.E.2d 253 (N.C. 1983).
302 S.E.2d 253 (Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
298 S.E.2d 749 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)