Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
302 S.E.2d 253
This text of 302 S.E.2d 253 (Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 302 S.E.2d 253 (N.C. 1983).
Opinion
Edwin F. PINNER
v.
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a New York Corporation.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Cecil C. Jackson, Jr., Asheville, for plaintiff.
Roberts, Cogburn & Williams, Asheville, for defendants.
Plaintiff's petition for discretionary review, 60 N.C.App. 257, 298 S.E.2d 749, under G.S. § 7A-31. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
298 S.E.2d 749 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
302 S.E.2d 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinner-v-southern-bell-telephone-telegraph-co-nc-1983.