Pinneo v. Knox
100 Ill. 471
Opinion
In this case, in the court below, a bill was filed to foreclose a mortgage, and a decree rendered in that court, and an appeal is brought to this court. Motion is now entered to dismiss the appeal. We have frequently held that a bill to foreclose a mortgage does not involve a freehold, and that the appeal should be taken from the circuit to the Appellate Court, and not to this.
The appeal will therefore be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed«
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pinneo v. Knox, 100 Ill. 471 (Ill. 1881).
100 Ill. 471 (Pinneo v. Knox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reagan v. Hooley
93 N.E. 380 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1910)
Allen v. Allen
90 N.E. 274 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1909)
MacDonald v. Dexter
85 N.E. 209 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1908)
Kronenberger v. Heinemann
60 N.E. 64 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1901)
Little v. Reid
42 S.W. 674 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
Pearson Lumber Co. v. Brady
42 N.E. 875 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)
McClellan v. Hurd
21 Colo. 197 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1895)
Baker v. Updike
47 Ill. App. 516 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)
Lynch v. Jackson
14 N.E. 697 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1888)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Watson
105 Ill. 217 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1883)