Pinnebad v. Pinnebad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Pinnebad v. Pinnebad

57 S.E. 89, 128 Ga. 73, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 30

DecidedApril 11, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 57 S.E. 89 (Pinnebad v. Pinnebad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pinnebad v. Pinnebad, 57 S.E. 89, 128 Ga. 73, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 30 (Ga. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, J.

In view of the Civil Code, §2503 (which declares that in cases of separation of the parents the court, upon writ of habeas corpus, may exercise a discretion as to the possession of the child, looking solely to his interest and welfare), and of the evidence disclosed by the record, it appeal’s that the discretion of the judge of the superior court, before whom the case was heard on habeas corpus, was wisely exercised in awarding to the mother the custody of the children, upon the terms prescribed in the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Fish, O. J., absent. Atkinson, J., disqualified. The other Justices concur.

Petition for habeas corpus. Before Judge Parker. *Glynn superior court. February 10, 1906.

Crovatt & Whitfield, for plaintiff. • Krauss & Shepard, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, J.

In view of the Civil Code, §2503 (which declares that in cases of separation of the parents the court, upon writ of habeas corpus, may exercise a discretion as to the possession of the child, looking solely to his interest and welfare), and of the evidence disclosed by the record, it appeal’s that the discretion of the judge of the superior court, before whom the case was heard on habeas corpus, was wisely exercised in awarding to the mother the custody of the children, upon the terms prescribed in the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Fish, O. J., absent. Atkinson, J., disqualified. The other Justices concur.

Petition for habeas corpus. Before Judge Parker. *Glynn superior court. February 10, 1906.

Crovatt & Whitfield, for plaintiff. • Krauss & Shepard, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 S.E. 89, 128 Ga. 73, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinnebad-v-pinnebad-ga-1907.