Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Raymond Michael Read, Mark William Read and Thomas I. Fetzer, Ii

Texas Supreme Court·Decided March 11, 2005·No. 04-0660·Published

Opinion

March 11, 2005

Mr. Edward Robert Human Flowers Davis, PLLC 1021 ESE Loop 323, Suite 200 Tyler, TX 75701 Mr. Karl C. Hoppess Karl C. Hoppess & Associates, P.C. 8200 Wednesbury, Suite 420 Houston, TX 77074

RE: Case Number: 04-0660 Court of Appeals Number: 10-00-00200-CV Trial Court Number: 11745-A

Style: PINNACLE GAS TREATING, INC. v. RAYMOND MICHAEL READ, MARK WILLIAM READ AND THOMAS I. FETZER, II

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause. The Motion to Amend Respondents' Brief is granted.

Sincerely, [pic]

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

|cc:|Ms. Sharri | | |Roessler | | |Ms. Diane Davis |

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Raymond Michael Read, Mark William Read and Thomas I. Fetzer, Ii, (Tex. 2005).

Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Raymond Michael Read, Mark William Read and Thomas I. Fetzer, Ii (Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Raymond Michael Read, Mark William Read and Thomas I. Fetzer, Ii) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.