Pinkus v. Incorporated Village of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pinkus v. Incorporated Village of Hempstead

16 A.D.2d 931, 230 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 931 (Pinkus v. Incorporated Village of Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pinkus v. Incorporated Village of Hempstead, 16 A.D.2d 931, 230 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by plaintiff taxpayers to declare arbitrary and unlawful a resolution of the Board of Trustees of the defendant village fixing the area of special assessment to defray the cost of acquisition of land for the widening of a public street within the village, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 6, 1962, which denied their motion for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The defendant concedes that, with minor exceptions, the assessment area comprises in essence the business and industrial center of the village, and that all residentially zoned land has been excluded. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by plaintiff taxpayers to declare arbitrary and unlawful a resolution of the Board of Trustees of the defendant village fixing the area of special assessment to defray the cost of acquisition of land for the widening of a public street within the village, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 6, 1962, which denied their motion for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The defendant concedes that, with minor exceptions, the assessment area comprises in essence the business and industrial center of the village, and that all residentially zoned land has been excluded. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 931, 230 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinkus-v-incorporated-village-of-hempstead-nyappdiv-1962.