Pinkston v. White
This text of 27 S.E. 665 (Pinkston v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the facts disclosed by the record, the trial judge did not err in sustaining the certiorari, it plainly and palpably appearing that the verdict rendered in the justice’s court was without any evidence to support it; but inasmuch as the final determination of the case did not necessarily depend upon a controlling question of law, and there were issues of fact involved, the case should have been remanded for a new trial, and therefore the rendition by the superior court of a final [562]*562judgment in the plaintiff’s favor was erroneous. Accordingly, direction is given that the judgment below he set aside, and that in its stead a judgment of the nature herein indicated be entered.
Judgment reversed,'with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 S.E. 665, 102 Ga. 561, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinkston-v-white-ga-1897.