Pinkston v. State
168 S.E. 789, 46 Ga. App. 666, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 175
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of larceny from the house upon circumstantial evidence which did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. It follows that the verdict was unauthorized and that the court erred in refusing to grant a, new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pinkston v. State, 168 S.E. 789, 46 Ga. App. 666, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
168 S.E. 789 (Pinkston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boyd v. State
177 S.E.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)