Pinkney v. Olins Rent-a-Car System, Inc.
This text of 27 A.D.2d 515 (Pinkney v. Olins Rent-a-Car System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from order entered September 2, 1966, denying defendant-appellant’s motion for an order modifying a previous order to the extent of directing that the inquest against defendant Carlos Rivera be held at the same time as the trial against the other defendants, unanimously dismissed as academic in view of our decision in companion appeal decided herewith [27 A D 2d 515]. In the event defendant Rivera fails to comply with the conditions for opening his default, the order is unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion granted on the authority of Kilpatrick v. Maya, 14 A D 2d 751. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 515, 276 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinkney-v-olins-rent-a-car-system-inc-nyappdiv-1966.