Pinkney Lattimore v. United States
274 F.2d 94, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 32
This text of 274 F.2d 94 (Pinkney Lattimore v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pinkney Lattimore v. United States, 274 F.2d 94, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 32 (D.C. Cir. 1959).
Opinion
Appellant was indicted and tried on two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon. Convicted on both counts, he was given concurrent sentences. Upon the trial he admitted the shooting and claimed self-defense and argued to the jury the theory of the right to stop a fleeing felon. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
274 F.2d 94, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinkney-lattimore-v-united-states-cadc-1959.