Pinkerton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Pinkerton v. State

1914 OK CR 53, 137 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 669, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 128

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 17, 1914

DocketNo. A-1901.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 53 (Pinkerton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pinkerton v. State, 1914 OK CR 53, 137 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 669, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 128 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted upon an information which charged that he did sell whisky to one Rush Kimmel. On the 16th day of December, 1912, he was senteced to be confined in the county jail for four months, and that he pay a fine of four hundred dollars. Numerous errors are assigned, but they are without merit. The information is sufficient. W. P. Calhoun testified that in the city of Enid, in the basement of the Turf pool hall on the 29th day of March, the defendant sold Mr. Scheidigger, Mr. Smith, and witness four drinks of whisky, and that Rush Kimmel paid him for it. This was all the evidence in the ease. The appeal being without merit, the judgment is affirmed, and the cause remanded to the county court of Garfield county with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted upon an information which charged that he did sell whisky to one Rush Kimmel. On the 16th day of December, 1912, he was senteced to be confined in the county jail for four months, and that he pay a fine of four hundred dollars. Numerous errors are assigned, but they are without merit. The information is sufficient. W. P. Calhoun testified that in the city of Enid, in the basement of the Turf pool hall on the 29th day of March, the defendant sold Mr. Scheidigger, Mr. Smith, and witness four drinks of whisky, and that Rush Kimmel paid him for it. This was all the evidence in the ease. The appeal being without merit, the judgment is affirmed, and the cause remanded to the county court of Garfield county with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 53, 137 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 669, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinkerton-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.