Pinkerton v. Bruen
16 Jones & S. 557
This text of 16 Jones & S. 557 (Pinkerton v. Bruen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pinkerton v. Bruen, 16 Jones & S. 557 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).
Opinion
Section 1013 of the Code gives a discretion to the court below to grant or to refuse the order [558]*558sought, and on this appeal we think that the order was within the proper exercise of that discretion (Martin v. Windsor Hotel Co., 70 N. Y. 101).
Truax, J., concurred. Order affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Martin v. . Windsor Hotel Co.
70 N.Y. 101 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 Jones & S. 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinkerton-v-bruen-nysuperctnyc-1882.