Pinkernelli v. Bischoff

New York Supreme Court

Pinkernelli v. Bischoff

2 Abb. N. Cas. 107

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Abb. N. Cas. 107 (Pinkernelli v. Bischoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pinkernelli v. Bischoff, 2 Abb. N. Cas. 107 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Brady, J.

In this case no exceptions were filed or taken to the referee’s report. There is little doubt of the justice of the referee’s conclusions. The only question which appears to be litigated here is that in reference to costs. The claim herein was not unreasonably resisted. It was properly contested, and it was reduced. The plaintiff is duly entitled to recover, therefore, only the fees of the referee and necessary disbursements to be taxed (Code, § 317).

Ordered accordingly, and that the report be confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady, J.

In this case no exceptions were filed or taken to the referee’s report. There is little doubt of the justice of the referee’s conclusions. The only question which appears to be litigated here is that in reference to costs. The claim herein was not unreasonably resisted. It was properly contested, and it was reduced. The plaintiff is duly entitled to recover, therefore, only the fees of the referee and necessary disbursements to be taxed (Code, § 317).

Ordered accordingly, and that the report be confirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Abb. N. Cas. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinkernelli-v-bischoff-nysupct-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack