Pink v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
This text of 248 A.D. 784 (Pink v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for money had and received (an implied contract) based upon an executed rescission of a transaction. Order denying plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh defenses and set-offs, founded upon contract claims, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Even though plaintiff’s grievance is one that grows out of an illegal or wrongful act of the defendant, plaintiff has, as a matter of election of remedies, elected to sue ex contractu. Having done so he has afforded the defendant the opportunity to interpose these set-offs under section 266 of the Civil Practice Act. It is the form of the remedy availed of in the complaint that determines whether or not the subject-matter of these set-offs is properly pleaded in that form. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pink-v-title-guarantee-trust-co-nyappdiv-1936.