Pink v. Seaman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pink v. Seaman

262 A.D. 797, 27 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 797 (Pink v. Seaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pink v. Seaman, 262 A.D. 797, 27 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendants have appealed from a judgment of foreclosure and sale and from an interlocutory order granting various forms of relief. Defendant Seaman is the owner of the equity of redemption. He took title to the premises subject to the mortgage which is being foreclosed. He and the codefendant had executed an estoppel certificate and an estoppel affidavit to the effect, among other things, that the mortgage being foreclosed is a valid first lien on the property affected and that such defendants know of no defect in the title or of any defense to the foreclosure of the mortgage. Defendants have not established any defense in this action. Judgment and order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenek, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendants have appealed from a judgment of foreclosure and sale and from an interlocutory order granting various forms of relief. Defendant Seaman is the owner of the equity of redemption. He took title to the premises subject to the mortgage which is being foreclosed. He and the codefendant had executed an estoppel certificate and an estoppel affidavit to the effect, among other things, that the mortgage being foreclosed is a valid first lien on the property affected and that such defendants know of no defect in the title or of any defense to the foreclosure of the mortgage. Defendants have not established any defense in this action. Judgment and order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenek, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 797, 27 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pink-v-seaman-nyappdiv-1941.