Pink v. Ricci

100 A.D.3d 1449, 953 N.Y.S.2d 538
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pink v. Ricci. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 A.D.3d 1446
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2012·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered November 21, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order, upon reargument, reaffirmed a prior order granting the cross motions of defendants Rome Youth Hockey Association, Inc., Whitestown Youth Hockey Association, Inc., Mark Wilbur and Christin Wilbur for summary judgment on their cross claims for contribution against defendant Matthew Ricci.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the cross motions of defendants Mark Wilbur and Christin Wilbur and defendants Rome Youth Hockey Association, Inc. and Whites-town Youth Hockey Association, Inc. for summary judgment on their cross claims for contribution against defendant Matthew Ricci are denied.

Same memorandum as in Pink v Ricci (100 AD3d 1446 [2012]). Present — Smith, J.P, Fahey, Sconiers, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pink v. Ricci, 100 A.D.3d 1449, 953 N.Y.S.2d 538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

100 A.D.3d 1449 (Pink v. Ricci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pink v. Ricci
100 A.D.3d 1446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)