Pink v. Ransom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pink v. Ransom

249 A.D. 753, 292 N.Y.S. 981, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5870

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s motion for a peremptory order of mandamus directing respondent to file in his office, without the payment of fees therefor, a certain proposed judgment roll, affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Young, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the ground that the proposed judgment roll is within the exemption of section 416 of the Insurance Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellant’s motion for a peremptory order of mandamus directing respondent to file in his office, without the payment of fees therefor, a certain proposed judgment roll, affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Young, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the ground that the proposed judgment roll is within the exemption of section 416 of the Insurance Law.

Pink v. Ransom, 249 A.D. 753, 292 N.Y.S. 981, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

249 A.D. 753 (Pink v. Ransom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.