Pink v. Kyle
This text of 251 A.D. 914 (Pink v. Kyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendants Harriet M. Kyle and Arthur C. Kyle from a judgment of the Supreme Court reforming a mortgage and as reformed granting a judgment of foreclosure and sale. The reformation of the mortgage to correct an erroneous description was properly decreed under the evidence and none of the defenses or counterclaims asserted by the defendants are supported by the evidence. The evidence sustains the judgment appealed from. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 914, 298 N.Y.S. 741, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pink-v-kyle-nyappdiv-1937.