Pink v. Harman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pink v. Harman

249 A.D. 753, 292 N.Y.S. 986, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 753 (Pink v. Harman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pink v. Harman, 249 A.D. 753, 292 N.Y.S. 986, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s motion for a peremptory order of mandamus directing respondent to file in his office, without the payment of any fee, a certain transcript of judgment affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Young, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent upon the ground that the transcript of judgment is within the exemption of section 416 of the Insurance Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellant’s motion for a peremptory order of mandamus directing respondent to file in his office, without the payment of any fee, a certain transcript of judgment affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Young, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent upon the ground that the transcript of judgment is within the exemption of section 416 of the Insurance Law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 753, 292 N.Y.S. 986, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pink-v-harman-nyappdiv-1936.