Pink v. Harman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pink v. Harman

249 A.D. 753, 292 N.Y.S. 986, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5869

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s motion for a peremptory order of mandamus directing respondent to file in his office, without the payment of any fee, a certain transcript of judgment affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Young, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent upon the ground that the transcript of judgment is within the exemption of section 416 of the Insurance Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellant’s motion for a peremptory order of mandamus directing respondent to file in his office, without the payment of any fee, a certain transcript of judgment affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Young, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent upon the ground that the transcript of judgment is within the exemption of section 416 of the Insurance Law.

Pink v. Harman, 249 A.D. 753, 292 N.Y.S. 986, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

249 A.D. 753 (Pink v. Harman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.