Pink v. Castro
This text of Pink v. Castro (Pink v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30376 18-NOV-2013 02:37 PM
SCWC-30376
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
HEINZ PINK, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
TERESA CASTRO, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(ICA NO. 30376; CIV. NO. 1RC-09-1-2589)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on October
9, 2013 by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Heinz Pink is hereby
rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 18, 2013.
Heinz Pink, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald pro se
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pink v. Castro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pink-v-castro-haw-2013.