Pink, Reginald Keith

Opinion

776-/5 7-77-/5 778-/5 77?./5 IN THE

ORIGINAL COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

/\/M IPW »^b» •«•

uwim wr vniii/mwL HhTtALS)

AUG 2 7 2015

REGINAL KEITH PINK, Abe! AcftsteuQterk Petitioner rILED IN v. COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS THE STATE OF TEXAS, AUG 27 2015 Respondent Abel Acosta, Clerk

From the 5th Court of Appeals, Cause Nos: 05-14-00877-CR, 05-14-00878-CR, 05-14-00879-CR, 05-14-00880-CR;

From the 283rd Judicial District Court, Cause Nos. F09-55346-T, F13-60732-T, F13-60733-T, F13-721123-T, the Honorable Judge Rick Magnis , presiding

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Reginald Keith Pink, Pro Se TDCJ# 1938997 McConnell Unit' 3001 S. Emily Dr. Beeville, Texas 78102-8583 361.362.2300 (ph.) 361.362.3011 (fax)

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents i Index of Authorities ii Statement Regarding Oral Argument iii Statement of the Case iii Procedural History 1 Ground For Review No. 1 1 The Court of Appeals erroneously affirmed petitioner's conviction holding that the Anders brief represents a professional evaluation of the appellate record— Ground For Review No. 2 2 The Court of Appeals erred in denying multiple pro se requests for evidentiary hearing to resolve issue of lost/missing transcripts— Ground For Review No. 3 2 The Court of Appeals erroneously confirmed the convictions holding petitioner was given a copy of the appellate reco rd and advised of his right to file a pro se response... Ground For Review No. 4 3 The Court of Appeals erred in holding that it reviewed the record, counsel's brief and pro se motions finding nothing in the record one might arguably raise on app eal ...

Conclusion 4 Prayer 5

Certificate of Service 6 Appendix 1V INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

Amendment 6 5

Amendment 14 5

FEDERAL LAW

28 U.S.C §2254 2 Federal Cases

Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967) 1 Dalton v. Battaglia 402 F.3d 729, 736 (7th Cir. 2005) 2 Hall v. Quarterman 543 F.3d 365, 367-69 (5th Cir. 2008) 2 Harich v. Wainwright 813 F.2d 1082, 1090 (11th Cir. 1987) 2 Jackson v. Estelle 570 F.2d 546, 547 (5th Cir. 1978) 2 Woodcock v. McCauley 563 F.2d 806, 808-09 (7th Cir.) 2 Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 34.6 4

Rule 38.9 3

Texas State Cases

Dunn v. State 733 S.W.2d 212-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) 4 Emery v. State 800 S.W.2d 530-33 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) 4 Gianous v. State 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969) 1 Harris v. State 790 S.W.2d 569 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989) 4 Kelly v. State 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-21 (Tex.- Crim. App. 2014) 2 Ortiz v. State 862 S.W.2d 170 (Tx. App. 4th Dist. 2014) 4

n STATEMENT REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT

Petitioner believes strongly that oral argument would be helpful to the Court in assisting them in deciphering exactly what occured during the Janu ary 23, 2014 arrignment/plea hearing that was recorded yet not made part of the appellate record. Further, oral argument is necessary to make the Court aware of. the harm and prejudice caused to the petitioner by not allowing the issues and Constitutional.violations which occured during that hearing to be raised on Direct Appeal to the Appellate Court. Petitioner believes oral argument should be permitted to reveal how the Court of Appeals erred in its fact finding, determinations thereof, and in the denials of pro se motions and requests to show documentary or otherwise evidence from either the Appellate Record or the Dallas Co. Judicial System Electronic Docket sheets, that, the January 23, 2014 hearing did in fact "take place, was recorded by the Court Reporter, and that portion of the Appellate Record is lost and or missing. Petitioner has shown due diligence by request ing these transcripts from the Court Reporter of the 283rd District Court, the Trial Court, as well as the 5th Court of Appeals/ and attempted to properly address the issue of the lost portions of the transcript prior to the submi ssion of the substantively defective Anders Brief. Petitioner intends to argue how his repeated requests for evidentuary hearing, which are the generaly accepted and usual course of jurisprudence in such situations. For these reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument be granted ,-

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On June 26, 2013, Petitioner, ReginaMPink (Pink) was convicted of robbery, two aggravated robbery w/ deadly weapon,,and one aggravated assault on a public servant in the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. The trial Court assessed punishment as LIFE imprisonment in each case. Petitioner appealed the convictions, and appellate counsel filed an Anders brief. On May 26, 2015 the 5th Court of Appeals filed a memorandum opinion affirming the convictions.

in PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 26, 2015, Petitioner Received notification of Opinion and Judg ment from the 5th Court of Appeals, informing him that his convictions had been modified and affirmed. On July 10, 2015, Petitioner filed a motion for rehearing with the Court of Appeals. On August 3, 2015 Petitioner received the Order from the 5th Court of Appeals denying the rehearing.

GROUND FOR REVIEW NUMBER ONE

The Court of Appeals erroneously affirmed petitioner's conviction holding that the Anders Brief represents a professional evaluation of the Appellate Record and meets the requirements of Anders v. California.

ARGUMENT:

The Court of Appeals erred in affirming the convictions based on an Anders brief that was based on appellate counsel's evaluation of an incompl ete appellate record which was void of transcripts from an arringment/plea hearing- held on January 23, 2014, where issues to be raised on direct appeal occured. These transcripts have been diligently sought in Pro Se motions to the Court of Appeals making the Court aware of the issue of lost and/or miss ing portions of the Appellate Record prior to counsel's submitted Anders brief. All such pro se motions were denied. Review should be granted based simply on the Court of Appeals decision to affirm on an incomplete appellate record, and any evaluation ignores the record and evidence giving rise to meritor ious issues that could be raised therefrom, (see Appendix Exhibits 3, 4, 5, & 6, as well as Dallas Co. Judicial Sys. docket sheets Ex. 2). These are documentary evidence, by a preponderance.of the evidence, that a hearing occured on January 23, 2014 and should have been recorded at the request of the parties and/or as a matter of regular Rules of Court. The Court of Appeals decision to affirm departs so far from the usual course of jurisprudence as to call for the exercise of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals powers of supervision, for the fundamental reason that an incomplete record makes any brief invalid, therefore, the .Anders brief filed in this ease does.not meet the requirements of Anders v• California 386 U.S. 738 (67') for the fact, it is based on an incomplete Appellate Record and the petitioner was not afforded an adequate opportunity to respond, (see Gianous v. State 436 S.W.2d .137. (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). GROUND FOR REVIEW NUMBER TWO

The Court of Appeals erred in its decisions denying multiple pro se motions and requests for evidentiary hearing to resolve the issue of the lost/missing transcripts and docket sheets being evidence of lost/missing portion of the Appellate Record.

ARGUMENT:

Careful review would show all petitioner's pro se motions were not fair ly evaluated, thusly, the Court of Appeals erred in. denying the requested evid- entuary hearing and ignoring the federally recognized standard entitling the petitioner to such a hearing when he can show clearly and convincingly with the evidence presented,. (see appendix exhibits) that its reasonable the pro ceedings in which he refers are to have taken place, (see also 28 U.S.C §2254). The Federal Courts have set the precedence in holding that petitioner is entitled to an evidentuary hearing in cases such as these, (see Dalton v. Battaglia 402 F.3d.729, 736 (7th Cir. 2005); Hall v. Quarterman 543 F.3d 365, 367-69 (5th Cir. 2008; Woodcock v. McCauley 563 F.2d 806, 808-09 (7th Cir. ); Jackson v. Estelle 570 F.2d 546, 547 (5th Cir. 1978); and Harich v. Wainwright 813 F.2d 1082, 1090. (11th Cir. 1987). Petitioner submitted exhibits 2-6 in his requests for an evidentiary hearing, and argues that the Dallas County Judicial System Electronic Docket Sheets in and of themselves entitled him to an evidentiary hearing. The above cited cases are examples of how the Appellate Courts decision denying petitioner's properly presented motions departed from the precedence in the proceedings creating a fundamentally unfair environment and depriving him of due process so as to call for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to exercise its power of supervision. For these reasons the Court should grant review.

GROUND FOR REVIEW NUMBER THREE

The Court of Appeals erroneously confirmed the convictions holding that, petitioner was given a copy of the Appellate Record, advised of his right to file a Pro Se response to the Anders brief, but failed to do so.

ARGUMENT:

The petitioner was not given a "complete" copy of the Appellate Record by either Counsel or the Court when counsel's Anders brief was filed as required. (see Kelly v. State 436 S.W.3d 313, 316, 318, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Therefore, petitioner was not able ,to properly respond without the lost/miss ing portion of the appellate record containing the hearing on Jan. 23, 2014 encompassing the constitutional violations to be' raised on appeal. Depriving petitioner of a "complete" record after due diligence requests also nullifies any opportunity to adequately respond to counsel's Anders, brief. (see Gianous v. State 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). In an attempt to obtain a complete record of the actual proceedings, petitioner sought and was granted a 30 day extension of time to file his' response to counsel's brief. In this time petitioner utilized all of his resources to gain a copy of the Dallas Co. Judicial Sys. Docket Sheets, (see Ex.2). The Court Advised petitioner to reply by the Feb. 4, 2015 deadline, however, his evidence was yet to be rec eived and timely requested an additional extension as other state agencies were less that expedicious in relinquishing the requested documentary evidence that would show that a hearing did in fact transpire as insisted upon by the pet itioner. Irregardless of petitioner's "just cause" the 5th Court of Appeals denied the motion for the second extension. A denial after a showing of good or just cause conflicts with.the decisions of other Courts on the same issue, who generally grant pro se litigants second request for extension when making a showing of just cause as petitioner in this case. This consequently, denied petitioner his guaranteed constitutional right of appeal. These aforementioned issues caused egregious harm and prejudice and created procedural defaults and errors petitioner sought to raise on direct appeal. This also created a legal prejudice affecting collateral review of these errors which, could be supported by the lost/missing transcripts. It is alleged these transcripts are being held by the trial Court leaving the App ellate Record incomplete. Petitioner made the Appeals Court aware of these issues in his submissions, hence are judicially noticed, (see Tex. R. App. Proc 38.9 (b) making the Anders brief substantively defective). For these reasons review should be granted.

GROUND FOR REVIEW NUMBER FOUR

The Court of Appeals erred in holding thet it reviewed the record, cou nsel's brief and petitioner's pro se motions and finding nothing in the rec ord that might arguably support the appeal. ARGUMENT:

The Court of Appeals erred in its investigation, review, and determinarion of the Appellate Record and petitioner's pro se motions filed. A close and exh austive review of the submitted record reveals undisputedly in comments made by the trial Court Judge, (see Ex. 3), the lead prosecutor,, (see Ex. 6) and the petitioner., (see Exs. 4 & 5).which were made in a Feb. 3, 2014 proceeding show unquestionably that a hearing was held prior to the 2.3.14 hearing and was held on the record. The transcripts of the "hearing" prior to 2.3.14 are not included in the submitted Appellate Record, thusly, the Court of Appeals could not have reviewed them. The certified copies of the Docket sheets, (see Ex. 2) and petitioner's motions, in the very least, gives rise that the Court of App eals review was not based on a "complete Appellate Record", and any determin ation thereon arguably removes subject matter jurisdiction, hence, voiding the resulting determination. The references made in the record submitted reflect other record portions not included, clear and convincing evidence that the rec ord in fact is incomplete. Affirming a case with an incomplete record conflicts with precedence set under substantially similar circumstances of other Courts of Appeals, (see Ortiz v. State 862 S.W.2d 170 (Tx. App. 4th Dist. 1993); also Emery v. State 800 S.W.2d 530-33 (Tx. Crim. App. 1990); Dunn v. State 733 S.W. 2d 212-214 (Tx. Crim.. App. 1987); Harris v. State 790 S.W.2d 568 (Tx. Crim. App.), holding that it has long been the rule in Texas that when an appellant, thro ugh no fault of his own or his counsel's is deprived of a portion of the state ment of facts [the appellate record] which he diligently requested, the app ellate Court cannot affirm, (see Tex. R. App. Proc. 34.6). For these reasons review should be granted.

CONCLUSION

Petitioner, Reginald K. Pink, in the above and foregoing information has showa the Court that issues exist, namely in the lost/missing transcripts, which , would show constitutional violations that could have been presented on direct appeal. Petitioner alleges these constitutional violations are specifically: 1. petitioner's counsel, admitted in open Court, that he purposely did not tell petitioner all his rights; 2. trial counsel refused petitioner's requests to do any investigation because he believed petitioner to be guilty; 3. trial counsel refused to file any motions on petitioner's behalf claiming it would be a waste of the Court's money; 4. petitioner and trial counsel, due to counsel's opinions of petitioner continuously on the record and off the record had conflicts of interests, such as: a) counsel refused to provide petitioner copies of police reports related to the causes; b) counsel refused to thoroughly explain the ele ments of the indictments and the repercussions thereof; e) counsel's request to the Court to force petitioner to give a plea; 5. the Trial Court's refusal to grant petitioner's repeated requests for appointment of different counsel, responding "its not your counsel's fault we are here," and indicating he agreed with counsel's assessments; 6. the trial Court's denials violated petitioner's 6th and 14th guaranteed constitutional right to effective representation and due process. Petitioner alleges there are other issues/violations but without the record cannot effectively cite nor argue them. For these reasons the Court should grant review.

PRAYER

Wherefore premises having been duly considered, Reginald K. Pink, petitio ner pro se, humbly and respectfully prays that the Honorable Court would grant his Petition for Discretionary Review. Petitioner seeks to have the record developed so as to include the portions that were intentionally or unintention ally not admitted as part of the Appellate Record, and once the record is whole he be permitted appointed counsel and new direct appeal of the above cited issues. Further, petitioner respectfully requests he be granted any general relief the Court deems appropriate or to which he is entitled under either Federal or Texas law.

Respectfully Submitted,

Reginald Keith Pink, Pro Se TDCJ# 1938997 McConnell Unit 3001 S. Emily Dr. Beeville, Texas 78102-8583 361.362.2300 (ph.) 361.362.3011 (fax)

EXHIBIT 1 Memorandum opinion 5th Court of Appeals

EXHIBIT 2 Dallas Co. Judicial Sys. Electronic Docket Sheets, Certified

EXHIBIT 3* Court Reporter's Record Feb. 3, 2014, vol 2 of 4, pg 30 Line* H^- EXHIBIT 4* Court Reporter's Record Feb. 3, 2014, vol 2 of 4, pg 31

EXHIBIT 5* l^'nes /-Y Court Reporter's Record Feb. 3, 2014, vol 2 of 4, pg 34

EXHIBIT 6* Court Reporter's Record Feb. 3, 2014, vol 2 of 4 pg 35

*(NOTE: Please see the Reporter's Record as indicated).

IV DECLARATION

I, Reginald Pink, does now attest that the foregoing documents and info rmation are true and correct and are thusly sworn to under penalty of perjury to their validity. (T.G.P. & R. §132.001-132.003 and 28 U.S.C. §1746).

911 P4 Reginald Pink, Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing and included documents have been properly served upon, the parties listed below at their respective addresses, as well as delivered to this Court. The documents were placed in the McConnell Unit mailbox with first class, pre-paid postage affixed, addressed to the Court of Criminal Appeals, c/o the Clerk of the Court, Abel Acosta at Capital Station, P.O. Box 12308, Austin, Texas 78711-2308. Executed on this the '£.£> day of A^USf , 2015.

Reginald Pink, Pro Se

also served:

Micheal Casillas Dallas Co. Dist. Attorny's Off. 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB19 Dallas, Texas 75207

State Prosecuting Attorney P.O. Box 12405 Austin, Texas 78711

Deemed Filed: Warner v. Glass 135 S.W.3d 681, 682 (Tex. 2004) ,/*

MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed May 26, 2015.

In The

Court ot Appeals! jftftl) Btetttct of tKexaa at Ballatf

No. 05-14-00877-CR No. 05-14-00878-CR No. 05-14-00879-CR No. 05-14-00880-CR

REGINALD KEITH PINK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F09-55346-T, F13-60732-T, F13-60733-T, F13-72123-T

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Reginald Keith Pink appeals his convictions for robbery, two aggravated robbery with a

deadly weapon offenses, and one aggravated assault on a public servant offense. See TEX.

Penal Code Ann. §§ 22.02(a)(2), 29.02(a)(2), 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). The trial court assessed

punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at life imprisonment in each case. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous

and without merit.* The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim.

App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. * We advised

appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v.

State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties "of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases). Appellant did, however, file several pro se motions.

' We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se motions. See

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's

duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in

the record that might arguably support the appeals.

Although not an arguable issue, we note the judgments in cause nos. 05-14-00877-CR

and 05-14-00879-CR do not correctly reflect appellant's pleas to, nor the trial court's findings

on, the enhancement paragraphs. In each case, appellant pleaded true to two enhancement

paragraphs alleging prior felony convictions, and the trial court found the enhancement

paragraphs true. The judgment adjudicating guilt in cause no. 05-14-00877-CR contains no

reference to the enhancement paragraphs and the judgment in cause no. 05-14-00879-CR states

"N/A" in the sections regarding the first enhancement paragraph. As a result, the judgments are

incorrect. Accordingly, we modify the judgment adjudicating guilt in cause no. 05-14-00877-CR

to show that appellant pleaded true to the first and second enhancement paragraphs and the trial

court found the paragraphs are true. We modify the trial court's judgment in cause no. 05-14-

00879-CR to show appellant pleaded true to the first enhancement paragraph and the trial court

found the paragraph true. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27-28

(Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529-30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991,

pet. refd).

-2- In cause nos. 05-14-00878-CR and 05-14-00880-CR, we affirm the trial court's

judgments. In cause nos. 05-14-00877-CR and 05-14-00879-CR, we affirm the trial court's

judgments as modified.

'UJ^?

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47

140877F.U05

-3- Court of Appeals jfiftFi ©tatrtct of tEexaa at ©alia*

JUDGMENT

REGINALD KEITH PINK, Appellant Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00877-CR V. F09-55346-T). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Whitehill participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt is MODIFIED as follows:

Add section "Plea to 1st Enhancement Paragraph: True."

Add section "Plea to 2nd Enhancement /Habitual Paragraph: True."

Add section "Findings on 1st Enhancement Paragraph: True."

Add section "Findings on 2nd Enhancement/Habitual Paragraph: True."

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt.

Judgment entered May 26, 2015. Court of Appeals! $ iftfi ©tetrtct of t&exaa at Ballasi

JUDGMENT

REGINALD KEITH PINK, Appellant Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00878-CR V. ' F13-60732-T). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and WhitehiU participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered May 26, 2015.

-5- Court of appeals jftftl) Btsitrtct of Cexa* at ©alias

JUDGMENT

REGINALD KEITH PINK, Appellant Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00879-CR V. F13-60733-T). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and WhitehiU participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is MODIFIED as follows:

The section entitled "Plea to 1st Enhancement Paragraph" is modified to show "True."

The section entitled "Findings on 1st Enhancement Paragraph" is modified to show True."

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.

Judgment entered May 26, 2015.

-6- Court of Appeals! $ tftl) Btetrtct of Cexas at ©alias

JUDGMENT

REGINALD KEITH PINK, Appellant Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00880-CR V. F13-72123-T). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and WhitehiU participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered May 26, 2015. 4JI66 < DA .CASE ID F-1360732 JUDCL CASE' ID F-13607:

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NARB-EIKK RE

JUDICIAL INFORMATION

A010-020-030-040 FILE DATE 101013

DEF NAME PINK_REGINALD_KEITH RACE B SEX M DOB 09151962 AGE 52

DEF ADR1 646_LACEWOOD DR AC PH SS

DEF CITY DALLAS ST TX ZIP 75224 DLNUM DLST

DT 092613 TYP/CL F 1 GOC/CAT CODE RB000000

COMT 3RD SID NUM 03736319 OF AMT

COMPLAINANT TAPE # ARREST DATE 092613

JUV STAT N REPEAT OFFENDER N CAREER OFFENDER N ORIG-LOC DSO CURR-LOC P

FILING AGENCY TXDPD0000 SER/CAS NO 247449A _247449A ARREST NUM 13046113

LAI NUM ; 493406 AIS/DSO NO 1828536 1828536 BOOKIN BOOKIN NUM NUM 13063777

JP FILE DATE OOOO00 JP CASE ID JP COURT ID FED EVH AFF

MAGISTRATE DATE 092613 MAGIS COURT 97 MAGIS JUDGE TURLEY BOUND OVER _

EXAM TRIAL DATE OO000O EXAM COURT EXAM JUDGE IND METH IHD

GJ/H/R DT 103013 H GJ# 2171 A2 GJ/W/FILE 110113 GJ OS T DA DSP A ACC X REAS

DA DISPOS DATE 101013 MISDEMEANOR REDUCTION _ SENTENCE PROBATED _

JUDCL CASE ID F-1360732 GJ CT FP PROS STAT A 656 PROS NAME PRYOR_CHRIS

COURT ASSIGNED TO FT DATE ASSIGNED 092613 ASSIGNED BY O REASON A

PRECEEDING DA CASE ID SUCCEEDING DA CASE ID

TRN 9176431916 TRS A001 WARRANT STATUS S STATE OFF CD 12990002

NEXT

* <*£ f^f <* &t- (m -tf)t>«»*»^

pq u CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360732 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360732

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

APPEALS

C020-50 CT DISP NO 01

DATE APPEAL MADE 062714;rCOPY STATEMENT OF FACTS FILED 000000 EXTENDED 000000

DESIGNATION OF RECORD DEFENSE 071614 STATE 000000 TRANSCRIPT FILED 082614

OBJECTION 000000 DATE NOTICE SENT 000000

DATE SENT TO APPEALS 000000 OPINION DATE 052715 MANDATE RECEIVED OOOOOO DISP _

MANDATE ENFORCED DATE 000000 APPEAL WITHDRAWN 000000 CT REPORTER INITIALS BB_

APPEAL REF CODE 0150 REC NO 50 _

GENERAL COMMENTS

C080 062714_WAIVER_OF_JORY_616/598 ;_2NDS3RD_TRUE-TRUE_2ND£3RD ;_FINDINGS_OF_DEAD

LY_WEAPON_KNIFE_AND_CUTTINGTOOI. DATE 062714 _

C080 062714_DEFT_EXCEPTS_AND_GIVESJNOTICE_OF_APPEALS_TO_THE_COXJRT_OF_APPEALS_5T

_PISTRICTJPAT.T.AS DATE 071614 _

C080 08062014 REPORTER'S REC /JR

DATE 080614

C080 08/20/2014_REPORTER•S_REC_CHECKED_OUT_BY ,_MATTHEW_J._KITA_/JR_

' DATE 082014

NEXT

#• CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360732 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360732

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

DISPOSITION

C020-01-02 CT DISP NO 01

VERDICT DATE 062714 BY JG DISP PGJG TC DISM TYP VOL 616 PAGE 597_

SENTENCE DATE 062714 BY JG TO L YEARS MTHS DAYS HOURS

SENTENCE TO BEGIN 062714 SENTENCE VOL PAGE DISCHARGE N TYPE _ NUM

PROBATED SENTENCE TO _ YEARS MONTHS DAYS _____ MULT SENT C

PROBATED FOR YEARS MONTHS DAYS PROBATION START DATE

SPEC COND 1 FOR 2 FOR

FINE CODE _ AMT 0.00 COST CODE _ AMT 0.00 PAYMENT DUE 000000

REDUCED/ENHANCED CHARGE

DESC COMT TYP/CL GOC _ COUNTY CODE STATE CODE

PROBATION REVOCATION FILE DATE 000000 WARRANT ISSUED DATE 000000

DISPOSITION COMMENT 092613-062714

MOTIONS

C020-30 CT DISP NO 01

DT/ FILED 071614:: MOTN TYPE MNT; MOTN PENDING STATEMENT OF FACTS FILED

D^Sd;:>PT/NEWl/TRIA-.>::F^-jaP;$. • SENT PENDING _ DISPOSED DT 090514 TYPE D COMMENT MTN/NEW_TRIAI_pENIED_617/802 REC NO 30

NEXT

3. CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360732 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360732

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

'NAMES

B070

ASSOCIATED NAME KITA,_MATTHEW_2146991863 NAME REF CODE AA1406270

CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO 24050883 BOND MAKER _ DT BOND MADE '

B070

ASSOCIATED-NAME LACY,_WAYNE_2146531317 NAME REF CODE CD1309270

CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO 11787200 BOND MAKER _ DT BOND MADE.

B070

ASSOCIATED NAME BRAY_J NAME REF CODE LP1310110

CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO BOND MAKER DT BOND MADE

B070

ASSOCIATED NAME PRYOR_CHRIS_ NAME REF CODE LP1310111

CT APPOINTED BAR NO BOND MAKER DT BOND MADE

CHARGE

C010

DEF NAME PINK_REGINALD_KEITH_ OFFENSE CD RBOOOOOO STATE CD 12990002_

DESC AGG ROBBERY COMT:: 3RD -^ TYP/CL: F 1 ^: GOC _

GJ COURT FP CURRENT COURT FT PREVIOUS COURTS CHOV DT

NEXT

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

SETS AND PASSES

B060

SET FOR DATE 050814 : SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS PRETRIAL

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 051214 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS 1ST HALF

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO Ol

B060

SET FOR DATE 062714 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE SENT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 _

BO 60

SET FOR DATE 100114 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS OVERRULE/MOT_NEW_TRIAL

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 _

NEXT

s *••'

•JJI6 6 DA CASE ID F-1360732 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360732

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE • C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

SETS AND PASSES

B060

SET FOR DATE 011614 : SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS ADMONISH

STATE ECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET #OR DATE 012314 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PflSSED"T©vPATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS 13063777

STATES REC NO J3-1-

B060

SET FOR DATE 012714 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION . REC NO 01

BO 60

SET FOR DATE 020314 .;i: SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

NEXT

ft <»• CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360732 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360732

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

BONDS

B050

DATE BOND SET 092613 AMT _100000.00 TYPE SET BY COURT 97 JUDGE TURLEY_

REC NO 01

SETS AND PASSES

B060

SET FOR DATE 112113 :; SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 121013 .;; SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 010714 :: SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

NEXT 0JI66 DA CASE ID F-1360732 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360732

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

GENERAL COMMENTS

C080 08/26/2014_CLERK•S_REC_FILED_5TH_COA_/JR

DATE 082614

C080 101014_pESIGNATION_pF_ITEMS_FOR_SUPPLEMENTAL_CLERK'S_RECORD_

DATE 101414

C080 10/21/2014_SOPPLEMENTAL_CLERK* S_REC_FILED_5TH_CQA_/JR_ DATE 102114

C080 11/03/2014_REPORTER •S_REC_RET_BY ,_MATTHEW_J._KITA_/JR_

DATE 110314

NEXT *

CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360733 JUDCD, CASE ID F-1360733

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF~NAME~PINK—RE- JUDICIAL INFORMATION

A010-020-030-040 FILE DATE 101013

DEF NAME PINK REGINALD . RACE B SEX M DOB 09151962 AGE 52

DEF ADR1 646_LACEWOOD_DR AC PH SS

DEF CITY DALLAS ST TX ZIP 75224 DLNUM DLST

OFF AA/PUB_SERV DT 092613 TYP/CL F 1 GOC/CAT CODE VA000200

COMT 3RD SID NUM 03736319 OF AMT

COMPLAINANT TAPE # ARREST/ DATE /092613:

JUV STAT N REPEAT OFFENDER N CAREER OFFENDER N ORIG-LOC DSO CURR-LOC P

FILING AGENCY TXDPD0O00 SER/CAS NO _247448A 247448A ARREST NUM 13046113

LAI NUM 493406 AIS/DSO NO 1828536 1828536 BOOKIN BOOKIN NUM NUM 13063777

JP FILE DATE 000000 JP CASE ID JP COURT ID FED EVH AFF

MAGISTRATE;DATE 092613 MAGIS COURT 97 MAGIS JUDGE TURLEY BOUND OVER _

EXAM TRIAL DATE 000000 EXAM COURT EXAM JUDGE IND METH IND

GJ/H/R DT 103013 H GJ# 2172 A2 GJ/W/FILE 110113 GJ DS T DA DSP A ACC Y REAS

DA DISPOS DATE 101013 MISDEMEANOR REDUCTION _ SENTENCE PROBATED _

JUDCL CASE ID F-1360733 GJ CT FP PROS STAT A 656 PROS NAME PRYOR_CHRIS

COURT ASSIGNED TO FT DATE ASSIGNED 092613 ASSIGNED BY O REASON A

PRECEEDING DA CASE ID SUCCEEDING DA CASE ID

TRN 9176431916 TRS A002 WARRANT STATUS S STATE OFF CD 13150011

NEXT

P3- '• CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360733 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360733

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

BONDS

B050

DATE BOND SET 092613 AMT _100000.00 TYPE SET BY COURT 97 JUDGE TURLEY_

REC NO 01

SETS AND PASSES

B060

_E^;:yFbit};-pATE';._i21;i3^. SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 121013 SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 016714:: SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

NEXT

X •'

0JI66 DA CASE ID F-1360733 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360733

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

SETS AND PASSES

BO 60

SET FOR DATE 011614 / SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS ADMONISH

STATES, RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

BOC

SSED TO DATE

b777

SET FOR DATE 012714 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION • REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 020314 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO Ol

NEXT

3, CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360733 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360733

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

SETS AND PASSES

B060

SET FOR DATE 050814 y SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS ____

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 051214 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PASSED TO DATE

SET. DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 060914 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE TRIL PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

BO 60

SET FOR DATE 062714 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE SENT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

NEXT CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360733 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360733

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

SETS AND PASSES

B060

SET FOR DATE 100114 ': SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS OVERRULE/MOT_NEW_TRIAL

STATES RECOMMENDATION • - REC NO 01 _

NAMES

B070

ASSOCIATED NAME KITA,_MATTHEW_2146991863 NAME REF CODE AA1406270

CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO 24050883 BOND M. DT BOND MADE

B070

ASSOCIATED NAME LACY,_WAYNE_2146531317 NAME REF CODE CD1309270

CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO 11787200 BOND MAKER DT BOND MADE

B070

ASSOCIATED NAME PRYOR_CHRIS NAME REF CODE LP1310110

CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO BOND MAKER DT BOND MADE

CHARGE

C010

DEF NAME PINK_REGINALD OFFENSE CD VA00O2O0 STATE CD 13150011_

DESC-: AA/PUB SERV ; COMT 3RD TYP/CL F 1 GOC _

GJ COURT FP CURRENT COURT FT PREVIOUS COURTS CHOV DT

NEXT CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360733 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360733

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

DISPOSITION

C020-01-02 CT DISP NO 01

VERDICT^ DATE b62714y BY JG DISP PCjijG| TC DISM TYP VOL 616 PAGE 601_ SENTENCE DATE 062714 BY JG TOyL # YEARS MTHS DAYS HOURS

SENTENCE TO BEGIN 062714 SENTENCE VOL PAGE DISCHARGE N TYPE _ NUM _

PROBATED SENTENCE TO _ YEARS MONTHS DAYS MULT SENT C

PROBATED FOR YEARS MONTHS DAYS PROBATION START DATE

SPEC COND 1 FOR 2 FOR

FINE CODE AMT 0.00 COST CODE AMT 0.00 PAYMENT DUE

REDUCED/ENHANCED CHARGE

DESC COMT TYP/CL GOC

COUNTY CODE STATE CODE

PROBATION REVOCATION FILE DATE WARRANT ISSUED DATE

DISPOSITION COMMENT 092613-062714

MOTIONS

CO20-30 CT DISP NO 01

DT/ FILED 071614" MOTN TYPE :MNT MOTN PENDING _ STATEMENT OF FACTS FILED _ DESC MOT/NEW TRIAL FILED SENT PENDING _ DISPOSED DT 090514 TYPE D

COMMENT MTN/NEW^TRiAL^DENiED_617/8b2_ REC NO 30 _ NEXT CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360733 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360733

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

APPEALS

C020-50 CT DISP NO 01

DATE APPEAL MADE 062714 COPY STATEMENT OF FACTS FILED 000000 EXTENDED 000000

DESIGNATION OF RECORD DEFENSE 071614 STATE 000000 TRANSCRIPT FILED 082614

OBJECTION 000000 DATE NOTICE SENT 000000

DATE SENT TO APPEALS 000000 OPINION DATE 052715 MANDATE RECEIVED 000000 DISP _

MANDATE ENFORCED DATE 000000 APPEAL WITHDRAWN 000000 CT REPORTER INITIALS BB_

APPEAL REF CODE 0150. REC NO 50 _

GENERAL COMMENTS

C080 062714_WAIVER_OF_JURY_616/602 ;_2ND_TRUE-TRUE_2ND,-_FTNDINGS_OF_DEADLY_WEAPO

N_KNIFGE_AND_CUTTING_TOOL DATE 062714 _

fc_8_':-b'627._4_pB^^ H_DISTRICT_DALLAS DATE 071614 _

C080 08062014 REPORTER'S REC /JR

DATE 080614

C080 08/20/2014_REPORTER•S_REC_CHECKED_OUT_BY,_MATTHEW_J._KITA_/JR_

DATE 082014

NEXT CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1360733 JUDCL CASE ID F-1360733

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

GENERAL COMMENTS

C080 08/26/2014_CLERK'S_REC_FILED_5TH_COA_/JR

DATE 082614

C080 101014JDESIGNATION_pF_ITEMS_FOR_SUPPLEMENTAL_CLERK •S_RECORD_

DATE 101414

C080 10/21/2014_SUPPLEMENTAL_CLERK' S_REC_FILED_5TH_COA_/JR_

DATE 102114

C080 11/03/2014_REPORTER•S_REC_RET_BY,_MATTHEW_J._KITA_/JR_ • DATE 110314

NEXT CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1372123 JUDCL CASE ID F-1372123

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF^-NAME P1NJL-RE-

JUDICIAL INFORMATION

A010-020-030-040 FILE DATE 111213

def name pink_reginald_keith RACE B SEX M DOB 09151962 AGE 52

def adr1 646_lacewood„dr AC PH SS

def city dallas ST TX ZIP 75224 DLNUM DLST

6f/F^-^gg_^bbery_ DT 091813 TYP/CL F 1 GOC/CAT CODE RBOOOOOO

COMT 3RD_F SID NUM 03736319 OF AMT

COMPLAINANT TAPE # ARREST /DATE y092613i:

JUV STAT N REPEAT OFFENDER N CAREER OFFENDER N ORIG-LOC DSO CURR-LOC P

FILING AGENCY TXDPD0000 SER/CAS NO _240371A ARREST NUM

LAI NUM 493406 AIS/DSO NO 1828536 BOOKIN NUM 13063777

JP FILE DATE 000000 JP CASE ID JP COURT ID FED EVH AFF

MAGISTRATE DATE 103013 MAGIS COURT 97 MAGIS JUDGE TURLEY BOUND OVER _

EXAM TRIAL DATE 000000 EXAM COURT EXAM JUDGE IND METH IND

GJ/H/R DT 112613 H GJ# 4191 Bl GJ/W/FILE 120313 GJ DS T DA DSP A ACC Y REAS

DA DISPOS DATE 111213 MISDEMEANOR REDUCTION _ SENTENCE PROBATED _

JUDCL CASE ID F-1372123 GJ CT FU PROS STAT A 656 PROS NAME PRYOR_CHRIS

COURT ASSIGNED TO FT DATE ASSIGNED 102913 ASSIGNED BY O REASON A

PRECEEDING DA CASE ID SUCCEEDING DA CASE ID

TRN 9176431916 TRS A003 WARRANT STATUS _ STATE OFF CD 12990002

NEXT

%

( Pt CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1372123 JUDCL CASE ID F-1372123

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

BONDS

B050

DATE BOND SET 102913 AMT _100000.00 TYPE SET BY COURT 97 JUDGE TURLEY

REC NO 01

SETS AND PASSES

B060

SET FOR DATE 112113 SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE 000000

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 _

B060

SET FOR DATE 121013 SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 010714 SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

NEXT

n- 4JI66 DA CASE ID F-1372123 JUDCL CASE ID F-1372123

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

SETS AND PASSES

BO 60

SET FOR DATE 011614 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS ADMONISH

STATES RECOMMENDATIQN. REC NO Ol

B060

SE/f FOR 'DATE 012314 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PASSED VO DATE

!ET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS 1306377>

STATES RECOMMENDATION NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 012714 i SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 020314 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS •

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

NEXT

PS CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1372123 JUDCL CASE ID F-1372123

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

SETS AND PASSES

B060

SET FOR DATE 050814 y'; SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 051214 y SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 062714 .':' SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE SENT PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS.

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

B060

SET FOR DATE 090514 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS EVIDENTIARY

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

NEXT «JI66 DA CASE ID F-1372123 JUDCL CASE ID F-1372123

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

SETS AND PASSES

BO 60

SET FOR DATE 100114 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE

SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS OVERRULE/MOT_NEW_TRIAL

STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 _

NAMES

B070

ASSOCIATED NAME KITA,_MATTHEW_2146991863 NAME REF CODE AA1406270

CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO 24050883 BOND MAKER DT BOND MADE

B070

ASSOCIATED NAME LACY,_WAYNE_2146531317 _ NAME REF CODE CD1310300

CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO 11787200 BOND MAKER DT BOND MADE

B070

ASSOCIATED NAME PRYOR_CHRIS NAME REF CODE LP1311120

CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO BOND MAKER DT BOND MADE

CHARGE

C010

DEF NAME PINK REGINALD KEITH OFFENSE CD RBOOOOOO STATE CD 12990002_

DESC;/AGG^OBBERY^ COMT 3RD_F TYP/CL F 1 GOC _

GJ COURT FU CURRENT COURT FT PREVIOUS COURTS CHOV DT

NEXT CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1372123 JUDCL CASE ID F-1372123

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

DISPOSITION

C020-01-02 CT DISP NO 01

V/ERDICT: DATE; 662714, BY JG DISP PGJG TC DISM TYP VOL 616 PAGE 599_ SENTENCE DATE 062714 BY JG TO L YEARS MTHS DAYS HOURS

SENTENCE TO BEGIN 062714 SENTENCE VOL PAGE DISCHARGE N TYPE _ NUM

PROBATED SENTENCE TO _ YEARS MONTHS DAYS MULT SENT C

PROBATED FOR YEARS MONTHS DAYS PROBATION START DATE

SPEC COND 1 FOR 2 FOR

FINE CODE _ AMT 0.00 COST CODE _ AMT 0.00 PAYMENT DUE

REDUCED/ENHANCED CHARGE

DESC COMT TYP/CL GOC _

COUNTY CODE STATE CODE -

PROBATION REVOCATION FILE DATE WARRANT ISSUED DATE

DISPOSITION COMMENT 092 613-062714

MOTIONS

C020-30 CT DISP NO 01

DT FILED 071614 MOTN TYPE MNT MOTN PENDING _ STATEMENT OF FACTS FILED _

DESC MOT/NEW TRIAL FILED SENT PENDING _ DISPOSED DT 090514 TYPE D

COMMENT MTN/NEW_TRIAL_DENIED_617/802 REC NO 30 _

NEXT CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1372123 JUDCL CASE ID F-1372123

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE

APPEALS

C020-50 CT DISP NO 01

DATE APPEAL MADE 062714 COPY STATEMENT OF FACTS FILED 000000 EXTENDED 000000

DESIGNATION OF RECORD DEFENSE 071614 STATE 000000 TRANSCRIPT FILED 082614

OBJECTION 000000 DATE NOTICE SENT 000000

DATE SENT TO APPEALS 000000 OPINION DATE 052715 MANDATE RECEIVED OOOOOO DISP _

MANDATE ENFORCED DATE 000000 APPEAL WITHDRAWN 000000 CT REPORTER INITIALS BB_

APPEAL REF CODE 0150 REC NO 50 _

GENERAL COMMENTS

C080 062714_WAIVER_OF_JURY_616/600;_2NDS3RD_TRUE-TRUE_2NDS3RD;_FINDXNGS_OF_DEAD

LY_WEAPON_FIREARM DATE 062714 _

C080 062714_DEFT_^EXC»PTS_AND_GXVES_NOTICE_pF_^PEALS_^TO_THE^COURT_pF_APPEALS_5T

HJDISTRICTJDALLAS DATE 071614 _

C080 08062014 REPORTER'S REC /JR

DATE 080614

C080 08/20/2014_REPORTER•S_REC_CHECKED_OUT_BY ,_MATTHEW_J._KITA_/JR_

DATE 082014

NEXT CJI66 DA CASE ID F-1372123 JUDCL CASE ID F-1372123

A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE

GENERAL COMMENTS

C080 08/26/2014_CLERK' S_REC_FILED_5TH_CQA_/JR

DATE 082614

C080

DATE 082614

C080 101014_DESIGNATION_pF_ITEMS_FOR_SUPPUEMENTAL_CLERK' S_RECORD_

DATE 101414

C080 10/21/2014_SUPPLEMENTAL_CLERK•S_REC_FILED_5TH_COA_/JR_ DATE 102114

C080 11/03/2014_REPORTER•S_REC_RET_BY,_MATTHEW_J._KITA__/JR_

DATE 110314

NEXT *,JI66 * DA CASE ID F-0955346 JUDCL CASE i/f-0955346 -v- A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE A010-020-030-040 J " D* " — * * >r o k MAT x 0 ^ DEF NAME PINK^GINAI^KSITH RACE B gEX MDQB OkIIm^IIe^II0 DEF ADR1 646_LACEWOOD Z!ZZZIZIZ~~~ AC PH «T

JUV STAT N HBP^T OFFENDEH , CAREER 0FFENDER N^Rl^-fUc^Sr^^ cXE-L05C0I FILING AGENCY TXDPDOOOO SER/CAS NO 139918W ARREST NUM LAI NUM 493406 AIS/DSO NO 1828536 BOOKIN NUM 13063777 JP FILE DATE 000000 JP CASE ID JP COURT ID FED ~EVH AFF MAGISTRATE DATE 030213 MAGIS COURT 94 MAGIS JUDGE R^DALL ~ BOUN"5 OVER ' EXAM TRIAL DATE 000000 EXAM COURT EXAM JUDGE ~ IND METH IN GJ/H/R DT 072309 H GJ# _1113_B2 GJ/W/flLE 072809 GJ DS T DA DSP A ACC Y REAS DA DISPOS DATE 061509 MISDEMEANOR REDUCTION SENTENCE PROBATED ~ JUDCL CASE ID P-°955346 <™ ^ ** PHOS STAT C 745 "proS NAME KEW ^ " COURT ASSIGNED TO FT DATE ASSIGNED 053009 ASSIGNED BY O REASON ^~ PRECEDING DA CASE ID SUCCEEDING DA CASE ID TRN 9174946080 TRS A001 WARRANT STATUS A STATE OFF CD 12990002 NEXT

f Sc^ pcx^t H$* (hXl't^hcam^

/ P3 CJI66 DA CASE ID F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 - A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE BONDS B050 DATE BOND SET 053009 AMT __150000.00 TYPE SET BY COURT OM JUDGE VICKERY_ REC NO Ol B050 DATE BOND SET 0328X3 AMT O .OO TYPE SET BY COURT 94 JDDGE RANDALL_ REC NO 02 SETS AND PASSES

B060 SET FOR DATE 040201 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 080709 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE FIRS PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 NEXT

X « JI.6 6 DA CASE I D F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID P-0955346 A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE SETS AND PASSES B060

SET FOR DATE 081209 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 081809 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 081909 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET ,TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS' FTA STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 082609 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 NEXT

3, <:JI66 DA CASE ID F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE SETS AND PASSES B060

SET FOR DATE 090209 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE . PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REc NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 090909 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 092409. SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 092809 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 NEXT

H. CJ'I66 DA CASE ID F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE SETS AND PASSES

B060

SET FOR DATE 100609 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE INVE PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 101309 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060

SET FOR DATE 102309 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE INVE PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 103009 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE INVE PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION • REC NO 01 NEXT

5 SJI66 DA CASE I D F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 A010 DEF NAME PINK RE CO10 DEF NAME PINK RE SETS AND PASSES

B060 SET FOR DATE 111009 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO.DATE 3ET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 111909 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS WATCHJVIDEO STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 112309 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS VIDEO STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 113009 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 NEXT

(*•

B060 SET FOR DATE 113009 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 02 B060 SET FOR DATE 120109 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO Ol B060 SET FOR DATE 120709 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 011410 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS MTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 NEXT

"7, CJI66 DA CASE I A010 DEF NAME D F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 PINK *"• RE onin -.-.-• „ CO 10 DEF NAME W»OOJ4& FINK RE B060 SETS AND PASSES

SET FOR DATE 030410 SET SET DISPOSITION CODE STATES RECOMMENDATION fASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS RASSED_IN_ADVANCE B060 — REC NO 01 SET FOR DATE 031110 SET SET DISPOSITION CODE FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE PASSED GENERALLY __ COMMENTS MTS STATES RECOMMENDATION B060 REC NO 01 SET FOR DATE 032510 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED TO DATE STATES RECOMMENDATION PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS B060 REC NO 01 SET FOR DATE 051010 SET SET DISPOSITION CODE STATES RECOMMENDATION PrSSErGENERATTY3^ PASSED GENERALLY _ ^ ™ COMMENTS PASSED CATS T° 4/15 DATE 000°° REC NO 01 NEXT

9. CJI66 DA CASE I D F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 AOlO DEF NAME PINK RE CO10 DEF NAME PINK RE SETS AND PASSES B060

1ET FOR DATE 051410 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PASSED TO DATE :ET disposition code PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS OPEN ITATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 BO 60 !ET FOR DATE 052110 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PASSED TO DATE >ET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS OPEN STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 JET FOR DATE 052410 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE JET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS HF.LD_AT_ATTY' S_REQUES' STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 062510 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS OPEN STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 NEXT

9, 4JI.6 6 DA CASE I D F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 AOlO DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE SETS AND PASSES B060

SET FOR DATE 040413 SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 < B060 SET FOR DATE 041613 SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 042313 SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 042513 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 NEXT

to. CJI66 DA CASE ID F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 AOlO DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE SETS AND PASSES BO 60 SET FOR DATE 050113 SET FOR TIME 0845 SET TYPE DISP PASSED TO DATE 00000 SET DISPOSITION CODE ___ _ PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO. 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 050613 SET FOR TIME 0845 SET TYPE DISP PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 051013 SET FOR TIME 0845 SET TYPE DISP PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 052013 SET FOR TIME 0845 SET TYPE DISP PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 NEXT

//, * JI66 DA CASE ID F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID P-0955346 AOlO DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME piNR m SETS AND PASSES B060 SET FOR DATE 052413 SET FOR TIME 0845 SET TYPE DISP PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 062113 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE REVK PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 100913 SET FOR TIME 0815 SET TYPE VIOL PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 110113 SET FOR TIME 0830 SET TYPE STAT PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS AWAITING_NEW_INDICt" STATES RECOMMENDATION _ _ REC NO 01 NEXT

IX

<3- £JI66 DA CASE ID F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 AOlO DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE 'S-ETiS-~AN-D--PA'S'&E.S.

SET FOR DATE 012314 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE PLEA PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMEN' 13063777 STATES RECOMMENDATION" J060 REC NO 01

SET FOR DATE~~0T2'7l~4 -SET- -FOR-TTME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS ADMONISH STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 020314 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE HEAR PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS ADMONISH STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060

SET FOR DATE 050814 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 NEXT

SET FOR DATE 062714 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE SENT PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION B060 REC NO 01

SET FOR DATE 100114 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE OTHE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED TO DATE STATES RECOMMENDATION PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS OVERRULE_mOT/NEW_TRIA; REC NO 01 NEXT CJI66 DA CASE ID F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID F-0955346 A010 DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE NAMES B070

ASSOCIATED NAME KITA,_MATTHEW_2146991863 NAME REF CODE AA1406270 CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO 24050683 bond maker B070 _ DT BOND MADE

ASSOCIATED NAME REYNOLDS_SANDRA_9727440444 NAME REF CODE CD0906010 CT APPOINTED Y BAR NO 00795611 BOND MAKER- _ DT BOND MADE B070 ASSOCIATED NAME LACY ,_WAYNE_2146531317 CT APPOINTED B070 _ BAR NO 11787200 BOND MAKER _ 5* BONDNAME MADEREF CODE CD1309270

ASSOCIATED NAME RILEY_AUDRA_ CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO NAME REF CODE LP0906150 BOND MAKER _ DT BOND MADE B070 ASSOCIATED NAME DUPLANTIS ,__STEPHEN_2147611398 NAME REF CODE PD1303130 CT APPOINTED _ BAR NO 24052192 BOND MAKER "_ DT BOND MADE _-. GENERAL COMMENTS J7S nnTF B080 032713 P/V .MTN_FILED;_WARRANT_ISSDED_.NO_BOND_ALLOWED A 032713 01 NEXT *JI66 • DA CASE ID F-0955346 tttf^t m *,

B080 101013 p7v^^^ISSD-"/B-aLl°HED-PER-JI,G-Maa'IS ~ ~~ _ »X "0413 01 101013 01 CHARGE C010

GJ COURT FI CURRENT COURT FT PREVIOUS c55^i . GOCDT CHOV NEXT ?JI66 ' °A CASE ID F-0955346 AOlO DEF NAME PINK RE Ji^ °ASE ID F-°9S5346 CO10 DEF NAME PINK bb C020-01-02 DISPOSITION ** VERDICT DATE 062510 BY JG DISP NAOG TP Dtom m CT DISE> NO SENTENCE DATE 062510 BY JG TO years — D^M TYP V0L 5" PAGE 907 SENTENCE TO BEGIN 000000 SENTENCE VOL P*™ °AYS HOURS PROBATED SENTENCE TO P YEARS SriFiii n DISCHARGE N TYPE Nu"m~ PROBATED FOR YEARS 10 MONT^i"" nfye °*YS MOLT SENT " SPEC COND 1 SF SAFEP~ FOR 365~~D~ 9 PROBATION START DATE 000000 FINE CODE N AMT __2000Tob COST CODE N~ AMT 490-00™ "^Tv ~ DESC ROBBERY EDUCED/ENHANCED C^RG^0-00 PAYMENT °UE °00°°° — — COMT TYP/PT v o r*^r<

PROBATION REVOcL0^^?^^^0^^"^^^- DISPOSITION COMMENT ™™™^ 101013 WARRANT ISSUED " DAt¥ 100413 NEXT ' ' ?nnnASE ID P-095534* JUDCL CASE ID P-0955346 AOlO DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PlS B C020-01-02 dispositxon 7ERDICT DATE 062113 BY JG DISP RFvr -n -.--w CT DI5P N0 ' SENTENCE DATE BY TO ^5L„« ~ °ISM TYP V°L 61° PAGE 728 SENTENCE TO BEcTi ~ENTENCE vS DAYS HOURS ~- PROBATED SENTENCE TO YEARS MoVfSs 7^ DISCHARGE N Ty^ _ NUM _ PROBATED FOR YEARS ~ MONTHS day. »J MULT SENT SPEC COND 1 FOR 2 probation start date ~ FINE CODE _ AMT 0.00 .0.00 rn"?T COST ^nr CODE ZHZ _ AMT =-^/°R PAYMENT DUE 0.00 REDUCED/ENHANCED CHARGE^ DESC COMT TYP/CL GOC COUNTY CODE _ STATE rnnp PROBATION REVOCATION FILE DATE DISPOSITION COMMENT WARRANT ISSUED DATE l&SUED DATE NEXT "I66 • . _5iSR_.FISxS,S_,_, name PINK RE CO 10 DEF NAME PINK RE CO2O-01-02 DISPOSITION VERDICT DATE 062714 BY JG DISP REVK TC DT^m tvd CT DISP NO SENTENCE DATE 062714 BY JG TO L^EARS ~ n-^1mtL SENTENCE TO BEGIN 062714 SENTFNPF vrvr V°L 616 HOURS DAYS — PAGE 596 PROBATED SENTENCE TO YEARS ^THS ^ 7^ °ISCHARGE * TYPE - ™~- PROBATED FOR YEARS ~ MONTHS~ nflvq ™- SPEC COND 1 FOR DAYS PROBATION START MULT SENT C DATE 000000 FINE CODE _ AMT-ZIZZO^O cdsF CODE _T AmFZswToo™ TFyM^NT DUE DESC ROBBERY EDUCED/ENHANCED CHAR^i AYMENT — . COMT TYP/CL F 2 POP PROBATION REVOCA??ONYF?LEEDA^E00000 ^ ^ ""0001_ ~ DISPOSITION COMMEN^O^^IO^^ C020-30 MOTIONS DT FILED 071614 MOTN TYPE MNT MOTN PFNDTMr om*m CT DISP NO DESC MOT/NEW TRIAL FILED SENT pZii" STATEMENT OF FACTS FILED COMMENT MTN/NEW TR"iAL DENIED 617/802 PENDING _ DISPOSED DT 090514 TYPE D NEXT ~=- CU10 DEF NAME PINK RE CO20-50 APPEALS DATE APPEAL MADE 062714 COPY STATFMFmt o- ™™o ' CT DI5P N0 DESIGNATION OF RECORD DE^lslT^xfs^l^CCCC!o^ OBJECTION OOOOOO DATE NOTICE SENT 000000 ^^^ EX™NDED OOOOOO transcript filed 082614 DATE SENT TO APPEALS OOOOOO OPINION DATE 0527m MMIMalo MANDATE ENFORCED DATE OOOOOO apn^T nxIL MANDATE RECEIVED OOOOOO DISP APPEAL REF CODE 0350 WITHDRAWN 000000 CT REPORTER INITIALS BB_" _„„ REC NO 50 eOftn o«9-m «--.-=.-. GENERAL COMMENTS C080 062510_WATVER_OF_JURY_593/908 - DATEo 62 510 " ——————

C080 062510_TRUE_TO_2ND_AND_3RD;_2ND_AND_3RD_FODND_TRUE DATE 062510 " " C080 061511_E/O_jyrc>D_COND_OF_PROB_599/347 _ DATE 061511 C080 030712_E/O_MOD_COND_PROB_603/852 DATE 030712 NEXT DA CASE ID F-0955346 JUDCL CASE ID P-0955346 - -- AOlO DEF NAME PINK RE C010 DEF NAME PINK RE rnfln „,„,, -._,__, GENERAL COMMENTS C080 062714_DEFT_EXCEPTS_AND~GIVESD-^TE _DXSraiCTjDJ__iAs_ NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE COURT OF appfats WH 07^i-"~tJK-^_Ay_**M_^«V»T_OF_AFPEALS_5TH C080 08062014_REPORTER'S_REC /OR DATE 080614 C080 08/20/2014_REPORTER.S_REC_CHECKBD_OUT_BX,_MATTHBW J. RITA /JR _ _____ DATE 082014 — — — - C080 08/26/2014_CLERK-S_REC_FILED_5TH_COA_/jR DATE 082614 C080 101014_DESI(SNATION_OF_ITEMS_FOR_SUPPLEMENTAL_CLERK'S RECORD DATE 101414 ~ C080 10/21/2014_SUPPL_a_3NTAL_CLERK'S_REC_FILED_5TH_COA /JR „__„ ; ; — . DATE 102114 uoit 1U^114 ~" C080 H/03/2014_REPORTER'S_REC_RET_BY,_MATTHEW_J._KITA /JR —— DATE 110314 ~ NEXT J5 $

§7V ?> v ^

t -ft

I -J

Is c_> ^ <^ On

\ r_ 5-

i1 m \r. ?-• Mr /7 // / ^ & i h i I , s -3* / i ?h ;-f. ? r. i i •?••

! f •.:•• '•» it" f "" fa t / l i t ! '- / ^ ^ - / '' w i . t;,'. N