Pinheiro v. Young Electric Sign Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Pinheiro v. Young Electric Sign Co.

535 P.2d 800, 91 Nev. 384

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 9, 1975·No. No. 7750·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant’s briefs do not conform to NRAP 28(e), which contemplates that briefs shall refer to those places in the appendix or record where matter referred to may be found. Moreover, appellant has cited a paucity of relevant legal authority concerning the appeal’s merits.

For these and other reasons, having examined the briefs and the record, we order this appeal submitted on such briefs and, finding it without merit, hereby affirm. NRAP 34(f) (1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant’s briefs do not conform to NRAP 28(e), which contemplates that briefs shall refer to those places in the appendix or record where matter referred to may be found. Moreover, appellant has cited a paucity of relevant legal authority concerning the appeal’s merits.

For these and other reasons, having examined the briefs and the record, we order this appeal submitted on such briefs and, finding it without merit, hereby affirm. NRAP 34(f) (1).

Pinheiro v. Young Electric Sign Co., 535 P.2d 800, 91 Nev. 384 (Neb. 1975).

Pincite

535 P.2d 800 (Pinheiro v. Young Electric Sign Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.