Pingree v. McDuffie
This text of 56 N.H. 306 (Pingree v. McDuffie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
FROM ROCKINGHAM CIRCUIT COURT.
Chancellor KENT (3 Kent's Com. Dig. 422) says, — "The weight of authority is, that the grantor has a right of way to his remaining land, in case of necessity, when he cannot otherwise approach his land. The law presumes a right of way reserved, or, rather, gives a new way, from the necessity of the case, and the new right of way ceases with the necessity for it. This principle of law has been for a long time recognized." He cites Packer v. Wellstead, 2 Sid. 39, Dutton v. Taylor, 2 Lutw. 1487, and Howton v. Frearson, 8 T. R. 50. In this latter case, Lord KENYON cites and recognizes the binding force of Dutton v. Taylor. The same doctrine is recognized by SHAW, C. J., in Bowen v. Conner, 6 Cush. 132.
The doctrine, which appears very reasonable, is also recognized and well settled by the above authorities.
LADD, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 N.H. 306, 1876 N.H. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pingree-v-mcduffie-nh-1876.