Pingree v. McDuffie

56 N.H. 306, 1876 N.H. LEXIS 142
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided March 20, 1876·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

FROM ROCKINGHAM CIRCUIT COURT. Chancellor KENT (3 Kent's Com. Dig. 422) says, — "The weight of authority is, that the grantor has a right of way to his remaining land, in case of necessity, when he cannot otherwise approach his land. The law presumes a right of way reserved, or, rather, gives a new way, from the necessity of the case, and the new right of way ceases with the necessity for it. This principle of law has been for a long time recognized." He cites Packer v. Wellstead, 2 Sid. 39, Dutton v. Taylor, 2 Lutw. 1487, and Howton v. Frearson, 8 T. R. 50. In this latter case, Lord KENYON cites and recognizes the binding force of Dutton v. Taylor. The same doctrine is recognized by SHAW, C. J., in Bowen v. Conner, 6 Cush. 132.

The doctrine, which appears very reasonable, is also recognized and well settled by the above authorities.

LADD, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pingree v. McDuffie, 56 N.H. 306, 1876 N.H. LEXIS 142 (N.H. 1876).

56 N.H. 306 (Pingree v. McDuffie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradley v. Patterson
435 A.2d 129 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1981)