Ping v. Hill
126 P. 411, 70 Wash. 699, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1110
This text of 126 P. 411 (Ping v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ping v. Hill, 126 P. 411, 70 Wash. 699, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1110 (Wash. 1912).
Opinion
In so far as the questions involved in this case merit discussion they are the same in substance as the questions presented in Waldrip v. Hill, ante p. 187, 126 Pac. 409. For tbe reasons there assigned, tbe judgment in tbis case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Waldrip v. Hill
126 P. 409 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 P. 411, 70 Wash. 699, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ping-v-hill-wash-1912.