Ping Hui v. T.J. Maxx of Texas, Inc., Marmaxx Operating Corp, D/B/A T.J. Maxx & Anthony Kellum & Massey Protection Services

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 21, 2019·No. 01-18-00384-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00384-CV ——————————— PING HUI, Appellant V. T.J. MAXX OF TEXAS, INC., MARMAXX OPERATING CORP, D/B/A T.J. MAXX; & ANTHONY KELLUM; & MASSEY PROTECTION SERVICES, Appellees

On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015-61011

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ping Hui, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file

brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal

of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief.

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ping Hui v. T.J. Maxx of Texas, Inc., Marmaxx Operating Corp, D/B/A T.J. Maxx & Anthony Kellum & Massey Protection Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Ping Hui v. T.J. Maxx of Texas, Inc., Marmaxx Operating Corp, D/B/A T.J. Maxx & Anthony Kellum & Massey Protection Services (Ping Hui v. T.J. Maxx of Texas, Inc., Marmaxx Operating Corp, D/B/A T.J. Maxx & Anthony Kellum & Massey Protection Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.