Ping Hui v. T.J. Maxx of Texas, Inc., Marmaxx Operating Corp, D/B/A T.J. Maxx & Anthony Kellum & Massey Protection Services
This text of Ping Hui v. T.J. Maxx of Texas, Inc., Marmaxx Operating Corp, D/B/A T.J. Maxx & Anthony Kellum & Massey Protection Services (Ping Hui v. T.J. Maxx of Texas, Inc., Marmaxx Operating Corp, D/B/A T.J. Maxx & Anthony Kellum & Massey Protection Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 21, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00384-CV ——————————— PING HUI, Appellant V. T.J. MAXX OF TEXAS, INC., MARMAXX OPERATING CORP, D/B/A T.J. MAXX; & ANTHONY KELLUM; & MASSEY PROTECTION SERVICES, Appellees
On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015-61011
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Ping Hui, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file
brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal
of case).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief.
We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ping Hui v. T.J. Maxx of Texas, Inc., Marmaxx Operating Corp, D/B/A T.J. Maxx & Anthony Kellum & Massey Protection Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ping-hui-v-tj-maxx-of-texas-inc-marmaxx-operating-corp-dba-tj-texapp-2019.