Pinewild Project Limited Partnership v. Village of Pinehurst

691 S.E.2d 17, 363 N.C. 856
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 28, 2010
Docket383P09
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 691 S.E.2d 17 (Pinewild Project Limited Partnership v. Village of Pinehurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pinewild Project Limited Partnership v. Village of Pinehurst, 691 S.E.2d 17, 363 N.C. 856 (N.C. 2010).

Opinion

691 S.E.2d 17 (2010)

PINEWILD PROJECT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP William Bruff; Jean Bruff; Tom Clark; Terry Clark; Richard Davis; Nancy Davis; Steve Desatnick; Merry Desatnick; John Flack; Dorothy Flack; Terry Ganse; Karen Ganse; Francis Gregory; Mary Gregory; Sandi Gruin; John Healy; Gwendoline Healy; James W. Hinde, Trustee For The James W. Hinde Trust; Earle Hightower; Laurene Hightower; John Jarrett; Linda Jarrett; William Jelochen; Richard Johnson; Barbara Johnson; Phillip Keel; Nancy Keel; Gerald Lally; Tatyana Lally; Jim Mellios; Fran Mellios; Charlie Mardigian; Sandi Mardigian; James McGillan; Kathleen McGillan; J.C. Norman; Connie Norman; Robert Norman; Vern Pike; Renny Pike; Daniel Posson; Poni Posson; Jim Pryor; Louise Pryor; Walt Santilli; Diana Santilli; Koichi Sato; Don Schneider; Mary Schneider; Dennis Stronjy; Gay Strojny; David Tremblay; Sandra Tremblay; David Walker; Lynn Walker, William Wendt; Hope Wendt; William Wright; and Suzanne Wright, Petitioners,
v.
VILLAGE OF PINEHURST, a North Carolina Municipality, Respondent.

No. 383P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 28, 2010.

Anthony Fox, Charlotte, Michael J. Newman, Pinehurst, for Village of Pinehurst.

C. Eugene Boyce, Lydia Owen Boesch, for Pinewild Project, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 679 S.E.2d 424.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th of September 2009 by Petitioners in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2010."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petty v. Petty
691 S.E.2d 17 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 S.E.2d 17, 363 N.C. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinewild-project-limited-partnership-v-village-of-pinehurst-nc-2010.