Pines v. Blair

273 P.2d 349, 127 Cal. App. 2d 130, 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1311
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedAugust 17, 1954
DocketCiv. No. 20232
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 273 P.2d 349 (Pines v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pines v. Blair, 273 P.2d 349, 127 Cal. App. 2d 130, 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1311 (Cal. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

DRAPEAU, J.

Among the items in this estate were an apartment house and parking lot in Pasadena, across the street from the Pasadena city hall. The property was appraised in the probate estate for $106,000. It had been appraised for $145,000 in the guardianship estate of decedent.

The county of Los Angeles became interested in the parking [131]*131lot. Later on the county decided to acquire both parcels. Neither the county nor the estate could agree upon the value. It was therefore necessary for counsel for the estate to prepare for trial a defendant’s case in eminent domain. Finally the county offered $157,500, which was accepted by the estate and approved by the probate court.

Counsel petitioned for extraordinary fees, objections were made, the matter was heard by the court, and an order made allowing counsel $10,000. From this order interested parties in the estate appeal. (See Estate of Blair, 126 Cal.App.2d 759 [272 P.2d 866].)

The probate court had before it evidence that supports the order. One of counsel testified to time spent in protracted negotiations, in familiarizing himself with values, preparing the legal case, and directing preparation for the presentation of the facts to a trial court.

It is only when there is a manifest abuse of discretion that a reviewing court will overrule such orders as this. (Estate of Lundell, 95 Cal.App.2d 352 [212 P.2d 914, 214 P.2d 23].)

The order is affirmed.

Doran, Acting P. J., and Mosk, J. pro tern.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guardianship of Blair
163 Cal. App. 2d 319 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)
Riley v. Ruoff
328 P.2d 986 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)
Riley v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
316 P.2d 956 (California Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 P.2d 349, 127 Cal. App. 2d 130, 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pines-v-blair-calctapp-1954.