Pinero v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pinero v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

515 So. 2d 422, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11102

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1987·No. No. 86-1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of this court’s decision in Henley v. J.I. Case Co., 510 So.2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we reverse the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Sears, Roebuck & Company. We certify the same question as was certified in Henley to the supreme court as being of great public importance:

DOES THE STATUTE OF REPOSE BAR A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION [423] WHERE THE DEATH OCCURRED MORE THAN TWELVE YEARS AFTER THE ORIGINAL PURCHASE OF THE PRODUCT WHICH ALLEGEDLY CAUSED THE DEATH?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of this court’s decision in Henley v. J.I. Case Co., 510 So.2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we reverse the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Sears, Roebuck & Company. We certify the same question as was certified in Henley to the supreme court as being of great public importance:

DOES THE STATUTE OF REPOSE BAR A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION [423] WHERE THE DEATH OCCURRED MORE THAN TWELVE YEARS AFTER THE ORIGINAL PURCHASE OF THE PRODUCT WHICH ALLEGEDLY CAUSED THE DEATH?

Pinero v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 515 So. 2d 422, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11102 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

515 So. 2d 422 (Pinero v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related