Pinero v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
515 So. 2d 422, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11102
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 17, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1926
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 515 So. 2d 422 (Pinero v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pinero v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 515 So. 2d 422, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11102 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
Opinion
On the authority of this court’s decision in Henley v. J.I. Case Co., 510 So.2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we reverse the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Sears, Roebuck & Company. We certify the same question as was certified in Henley to the supreme court as being of great public importance:
DOES THE STATUTE OF REPOSE BAR A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION [423]*423WHERE THE DEATH OCCURRED MORE THAN TWELVE YEARS AFTER THE ORIGINAL PURCHASE OF THE PRODUCT WHICH ALLEGEDLY CAUSED THE DEATH?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Pinero
529 So. 2d 1105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
515 So. 2d 422, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinero-v-sears-roebuck-co-fladistctapp-1987.