Pinera v. Target/Sedgwick CMS

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pinera v. Target/Sedgwick CMS

218 So. 3d 926, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15027

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 2016·No. No. 1D15-4077·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In light of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 194 So.3d 311 (Fla.2016), Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, filed June 9, 2016, is granted, and our opinion rendered June 7, 2016, is withdrawn. This matter is remanded to the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) for reconsideration consistent with Westphal. The JCC also shall determine whether additional defenses asserted by the Appellees, if any, are appropriately raised and resolved under the circumstances of this case and the material change in the law represented by West-phal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WETHERELL and KELSEY, JJ., and DEMPSEY, ANGELA C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In light of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 194 So.3d 311 (Fla.2016), Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, filed June 9, 2016, is granted, and our opinion rendered June 7, 2016, is withdrawn. This matter is remanded to the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) for reconsideration consistent with Westphal. The JCC also shall determine whether additional defenses asserted by the Appellees, if any, are appropriately raised and resolved under the circumstances of this case and the material change in the law represented by West-phal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WETHERELL and KELSEY, JJ., and DEMPSEY, ANGELA C., Associate Judge, concur.

Pinera v. Target/Sedgwick CMS, 218 So. 3d 926, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15027 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

218 So. 3d 926 (Pinera v. Target/Sedgwick CMS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related