Piner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Piner v. State

119 S.W.2d 164, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 121

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJuly 14, 1938

DocketNo. 3725.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 119 S.W.2d 164 (Piner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piner v. State, 119 S.W.2d 164, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 121 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a suit by the State of Texas against R. G. Piner, Jr., to enjoin the defendant from unlawfully practicing medicine. At the conclusion of the evidence an “instructed verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff and judgment rendered in accordance therewith. The record contains no bill of exception nor statement of facts. Appellant’s assignments of error complain of the peremptory charge and of a ruling upon evidence. In the absence of a statement of facts it must be assumed the undisputed evidence warranted the peremptory charge; and, in the absence of a bill of exception covering the matter, this Court cannot consider the assignment complaining of the ruling upon evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a suit by the State of Texas against R. G. Piner, Jr., to enjoin the defendant from unlawfully practicing medicine. At the conclusion of the evidence an “instructed verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff and judgment rendered in accordance therewith. The record contains no bill of exception nor statement of facts. Appellant’s assignments of error complain of the peremptory charge and of a ruling upon evidence. In the absence of a statement of facts it must be assumed the undisputed evidence warranted the peremptory charge; and, in the absence of a bill of exception covering the matter, this Court cannot consider the assignment complaining of the ruling upon evidence.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 S.W.2d 164, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piner-v-state-texapp-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack