Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority v. Wrye ex rel. Wrye

750 So. 2d 30, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7630, 1996 WL 403333
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 1996·No. No. 95-04719·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

The Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) appeals a nonfinal order challenging the denial of its motion to dismiss based on sovereign immunity. Jonathan Wrye and Mary A. Wrye filed a complaint against PSTA alleging negligence and breach of contract.

We conclude that we do not have jurisdiction to review the denial of the motion to dismiss based on sovereign immunity either as a nonfinal appeal or as a certiora-ri proceeding. In reaching such a conclusion, we align ourselves with State, Department of Transportation v. Paris, 665 So.2d 381 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Department of Education v. Roe, 656 So.2d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), review granted, 663 So.2d 629 (Fla.1995); and with Judge Sharpe’s well-reasoned dissent in Department of Transportation v. Wallis, 659 So.2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). As did the Fourth District in the Paris case, we adopt Judge Sharpe’s reasoning as our own and, accordingly, recognize conflict with the majority opinion in Wallis.

Appeal dismissed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority v. Wrye ex rel. Wrye, 750 So. 2d 30, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7630, 1996 WL 403333 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

750 So. 2d 30 (Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority v. Wrye ex rel. Wrye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. Miami-Dade County
117 So. 3d 400 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
City of Freeport v. Beach Community Bank
108 So. 3d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Miami-Dade County v. Rodriguez
67 So. 3d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)