Pinellas Classroom Teachers' Ass'n v. School Board of Pinellas County

805 So. 2d 937, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15676, 2001 WL 1358983
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-797
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 805 So. 2d 937 (Pinellas Classroom Teachers' Ass'n v. School Board of Pinellas County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pinellas Classroom Teachers' Ass'n v. School Board of Pinellas County, 805 So. 2d 937, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15676, 2001 WL 1358983 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

The Pinellas Classroom Teachers’ Association (PCTA) challenges the trial court’s order which denied PCTA’s request for a temporary injunction against the School Board of Pinellas County. We affirm.

PCTA asked the trial court for a declaratory judgment ruling that section 231.2905(3), Florida Statutes (1999), is facially unconstitutional. That statute, among other things, authorizes incentive awards to be paid to certain schools either for distribution to employees as bonuses or for the procurement of additional educational materials. PCTA maintains that the statute is unconstitutional because it allows the incentive bonuses to be paid without resort to collective bargaining first, thus abridging the constitutional right of teachers to bargain collectively as to wages. PCTA argues further that due to the facial unconstitutionality of the statute, the trial court erred in refusing to enjoin the Board from paying the bonuses.

We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s refusal to grant PCTA’s request for a temporary injunction. We write only to explain that in affirming the trial court’s order which denied PCTA’s request for an injunction, we need not rule on the constitutionality of the statute because the trial court specifically declined to rule on that issue, deferring ruling on that issue to the judge to whom the case had originally been assigned. There being no trial court ruling for us to review concerning the statute’s constitutionality, our affir-mance of the refusal to enter a temporary injunction does not affect or address the constitutionality of the statute.

Affirmed.

BLUE, C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hillsborough County v. ROCHE SUR. & CAS. CO., INC.
805 So. 2d 937 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
805 So. 2d 937, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15676, 2001 WL 1358983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinellas-classroom-teachers-assn-v-school-board-of-pinellas-county-fladistctapp-2001.