Pineland Club v. Sanders
214 F. 85, 130 C.C.A. 612, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1122
Opinion
After careful consideration of the elaborate argument of the plaintiff in error, we have no doubt that the two opinions of the District Judge,- one on the original hearing and the other in denying the motion for a new trial, conclusively show that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the land in controversy; and we deem it unnecessary to restate the reasons.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pineland Club v. Sanders, 214 F. 85, 130 C.C.A. 612, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1122 (4th Cir. 1914).
214 F. 85 (Pineland Club v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.