Pinegar v. First National Bank

110 P.2d 129, 43 Cal. App. 2d 846, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 738
California Court of Appeal·Decided February 14, 1941·No. Civ. No. 2612·Published

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal from the judgment. Nothing has been filed in this court except the papers on this motion.

From the certificate of the county clerk it appears that the judgment was entered on June 28, 1940; that notice of appeal and notice to prepare transcript were filed on August 28, 1940, and that on October 26, 1940, an order was entered in the trial court terminating proceedings for the preparation of a transcript, which order recites that no undertaking was filed and no personal arrangements were made for the compensation of the stenographic reporter; that no extension of time had been granted; and that no bill of exceptions had ever been presented or filed.

The showing being sufficient (Foster v. Carey, 33 Cal. App. (2d) 543 [92 Pac. (2d) 444]), the motion must be granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pinegar v. First National Bank, 110 P.2d 129, 43 Cal. App. 2d 846, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 738 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941).

110 P.2d 129 (Pinegar v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. Carey
92 P.2d 444 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)