Pinegar v. First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Pinegar v. First National Bank

110 P.2d 129, 43 Cal. App. 2d 846, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 738

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 14, 1941

DocketCiv. No. 2612

StatusPublished

This text of 110 P.2d 129 (Pinegar v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pinegar v. First National Bank, 110 P.2d 129, 43 Cal. App. 2d 846, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 738 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal from the judgment. Nothing has been filed in this court except the papers on this motion.

From the certificate of the county clerk it appears that the judgment was entered on June 28, 1940; that notice of appeal and notice to prepare transcript were filed on August 28, 1940, and that on October 26, 1940, an order was entered in the trial court terminating proceedings for the preparation of a transcript, which order recites that no undertaking was filed and no personal arrangements were made for the compensation of the stenographic reporter; that no extension of time had been granted; and that no bill of exceptions had ever been presented or filed.

The showing being sufficient (Foster v. Carey, 33 Cal. App. (2d) 543 [92 Pac. (2d) 444]), the motion must be granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNARD, P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal from the judgment. Nothing has been filed in this court except the papers on this motion.

From the certificate of the county clerk it appears that the judgment was entered on June 28, 1940; that notice of appeal and notice to prepare transcript were filed on August 28, 1940, and that on October 26, 1940, an order was entered in the trial court terminating proceedings for the preparation of a transcript, which order recites that no undertaking was filed and no personal arrangements were made for the compensation of the stenographic reporter; that no extension of time had been granted; and that no bill of exceptions had ever been presented or filed.

The showing being sufficient (Foster v. Carey, 33 Cal. App. (2d) 543 [92 Pac. (2d) 444]), the motion must be granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 P.2d 129, 43 Cal. App. 2d 846, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinegar-v-first-national-bank-calctapp-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack