Pineda v. Wayne Cty. B.O.E.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedOctober 1, 2003
DocketI.C. NO. TA-16317
StatusPublished

This text of Pineda v. Wayne Cty. B.O.E. (Pineda v. Wayne Cty. B.O.E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pineda v. Wayne Cty. B.O.E., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2003).

Opinion

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Decision and Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence reaches the same facts and conclusions as those reached by the Deputy Commissioner except for modification of the award and enters the following Decision and Order.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All the parties are properly before the Industrial Commission, and the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction over the parties and this claim. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Tort Claims Act.

2. Jessica Ruiz (hereinafter "plaintiff"), a minor, suffered an injury on or about September 16, 1997. She was born June 7, 1989 and was age 8 years and 3.5 months at the time of the incident.

3. Any injuries to the minor plaintiff occurred when she was struck by an automobile driven by Evelyn Lamm Barwick, who is not a party to this action. Further, Evelyn Lamm Barwick and defendant herein were both parties to an action pending in the Superior Court Division of the General Court of Justice of Wayne County, and as a result of settlement reached in that case between plaintiff and Evelyn Lamm Barwick, defendant herein is entitled to a credit of $1,000.00 for damages paid by the automobile liability carrier for Evelyn Lamm Barwick.

4. The following exhibits were stipulated into evidence by the parties at the hearing before Deputy Commissioner Glenn:

a. Stipulated Exhibit 1-DMV 349

b. Stipulated Exhibit 2 — note to school

c. Stipulated Exhibit 3 — handwritten note to Ethel Britt

e. Stipulated Exhibit 4 — school bus report

f. Stipulated Exhibit 5 — medical records of Jennifer Ruiz

g. Stipulated Exhibit 6 — medical expense report of Jennifer Ruiz

h. Stipulated Exhibit 7 — itemization of Exhibit 6 medical expense report of Jennifer Ruiz

i. Stipulated Exhibit 8 — medical records of Jessica Ruiz

j. Stipulated Exhibit 9 — medical expense summary of Jessica Ruiz

k. Stipulated Exhibit 10 — medical bills of Jessica Ruiz

l. Stipulated Exhibit 11-deposition of Dr. Frederick L. Davis

m. Stipulated Exhibit 12 — photos of eastbound scene of accident

n. Stipulated Exhibit 13 — photos of westbound scene of accident

5. The parties filed a Pre-Trial Agreement and an Addendum to the Pre-Trial Agreement. The Addendum stipulated that for all purposes, all evidence received in this claim may be used in the companion case involving plaintiff's sister, Jennifer Ruiz (I.C. No. TA-16320).

6. The issues before the Commission are whether plaintiff, a minor, was injured by the negligence of defendant; was plaintiff, a minor, contributorily negligent; what amount of damages, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover of and from defendant for the injuries and expenses sustained; what amount of damages are the parents of the minor plaintiff, Jessica Ruiz, entitled to recover?

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff was fourteen years old. On September 16, 1997, plaintiff was 8 years old with a birthday of June 7, 1989.

2. On September 16, 1997, plaintiff was a student in the Wayne County Public Schools. Plaintiff was on a school bus driven by Ethel Britt and owned by defendant. Ms. Britt was named in plaintiff's affidavit as the negligent state employee. The school bus transported elementary school children.

3. Plaintiff and Jennifer, her older sister, had been riding the school bus operated by Ms. Britt twice a week for approximately two weeks. The sisters got off the bus at the regular stop in front of Creation Station along with other children who went to the after-school care program at Creation Station. Creation Station is located off the right hand side of the road and the children attending the center did not have to cross the street after exiting the school bus. Plaintiff and her sister did not attend the after-school program at Creation Station but got off the bus at this stop to go to the home of Marian Strang from whom they were taking English lessons. Upon exiting the bus, plaintiff and her sister had to cross the street to get to Mrs. Strang's home.

4. On September 16, 1997, plaintiff and Jennifer got off the school bus being operated by Ms. Britt at approximately 1:20 p.m. in front of Creation Station with a number of other children. After getting off the bus, plaintiff and her sister walked along the side of the road to the rear of the bus and just as the bus was pulling off, plaintiff and Jennifer darted out into the roadway behind the bus in an attempt to cross the street. As plaintiff and Jennifer were crossing the roadway, Jennifer was struck by an automobile being operated by Evelyn Lamm Barwick coming from the opposite direction in which the school bus was traveling. Ms. Barwick indicated that she observed the stop sign on the bus go down and as the school bus pulled off, she saw a flash of color dart into the street. Ms. Barwick swerved to the right and applied her brakes in an attempt to miss plaintiff and her sister. Mrs. Barwick was not able to avoid hitting plaintiff and Jennifer.

5. Timothy Warrick was the driver of the vehicle directly behind the school bus being driven by Ms. Britt. He saw plaintiff, Jennifer and the other children get off the bus on September 16, 1997. Mr. Warrick stated that the bus stopped and a number of children got off. The children were playing in the ditch not far from the road. Mr. Warrick was sitting in his vehicle with his foot on the brake waiting to see what the children were going to do. Mr. Warrick noticed plaintiff and Jennifer leave the group and realized that they were going to cross the street just as the bus was pulling off. He also saw a car coming from the opposite direction.

6. Plaintiff and Jennifer ran out into the street behind the bus, in front of Mr. Warrick's vehicle and in front of the oncoming car driven by Ms. Barwick. Jennifer was knocked up on the hood and windshield of the car that struck her and then she fell into the street. Plaintiff's foot was struck by the vehicle. Plaintiff was screaming and pulling on Jennifer, who was not moving. Mr. Warrick got out of his vehicle to prevent another vehicle from hitting either child. Mr. Warrick attempted to find out where the sisters were going but plaintiff spoke no English.

7. Immediately after the accident, the children on the bus told Ms. Britt that plaintiff and her sister had been hit by a car. Ms. Britt stopped at her next scheduled stop and contacted the school and the bus garage to inform them that a child had been hit by a car.

8. Plaintiff had a total of $1,063.28 in medical expenses as a result of treatment for the injuries she sustained in the accident of September 16, 1997 and was treated at Wayne Memorial Hospital following the accident. Plaintiff received counseling from April 24, 1998 to June 25, 1998.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walston v. Greene
102 S.E.2d 124 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
153 S.E.2d 335 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Slade v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
179 S.E.2d 453 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
Slade Ex Rel. Slade v. New Hanover County Board of Education
178 S.E.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Greene v. Mitchell County Board of Education
75 S.E.2d 129 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Hughes v. . Thayer
51 S.E.2d 488 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pineda v. Wayne Cty. B.O.E., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pineda-v-wayne-cty-boe-ncworkcompcom-2003.