Pineda v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Pineda v. State

272 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 251

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 27, 1925

DocketNo. 9304

StatusPublished

This text of 272 S.W. 1117 (Pineda v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pineda v. State, 272 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 251 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction in the district court of Wilson county for murder; punishment, 50 years in the penitentiary. The case comes before us without any complaint of any procedure in the trial of same. No exceptions were taken to the charge of the court, nor .to the reception or rejection of any testimony. We have gone carefully over the statement of facts, and see no benefit to accrue from a lengthy recital of same. The testimony for the state sufficiently shows that appellant participated in the murder of one Mr. Neill for no other purpose than getting from Neill the little money which he had. The state used one of the participants in the commission of [1118]*1118the crime as a witness. The testimony abundantly meets the requirements of the law in the matter of corroboration of this witness. Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction in the district court of Wilson county for murder; punishment, 50 years in the penitentiary. The case comes before us without any complaint of any procedure in the trial of same. No exceptions were taken to the charge of the court, nor .to the reception or rejection of any testimony. We have gone carefully over the statement of facts, and see no benefit to accrue from a lengthy recital of same. The testimony for the state sufficiently shows that appellant participated in the murder of one Mr. Neill for no other purpose than getting from Neill the little money which he had. The state used one of the participants in the commission of [1118]*1118the crime as a witness. The testimony abundantly meets the requirements of the law in the matter of corroboration of this witness. Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pineda-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.